public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug lto/41079] New: Bootstrap comparison fails, executables contain .gnu.lto_* sections
@ 2009-08-15 15:58 rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-16 12:48 ` [Bug lto/41079] Bootstrap comparison fails, collect2 links against lto archives rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 more replies)
0 siblings, 7 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-08-15 15:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
Likely because .gnu.lto_* sections remain in the final executables (like for
example cc1-dummy) bootstrap with BOOT_CFLAGS="-O2 -flto -g"
BOOT_LDFLAGS="-flto"
currently fails at comparing stage2 and stage3.
Comparing stage2 and stage3 cc1-dummy readelf -S output reveals:
--- a 2009-08-15 17:25:19.000000000 +0200
+++ b 2009-08-15 17:25:22.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-There are 13739 section headers, starting at offset 0x67e1b6c:
+There are 13739 section headers, starting at offset 0x67e3424:
Section Headers:
[Nr] Name Type Addr Off Size ES Flg Lk Inf
Al
@@ -29,13718 +29,13718 @@
[24] .bss NOBITS 08b090c0 ac00c0 06f6b8 00 WA 0 0
32
[25] .gnu.lto_.referen PROGBITS 00000000 ac00c0 0019c6 00 0 0
4
[26] .gnu.lto_.purecon PROGBITS 00000000 ac1a88 008daa 00 0 0
4
- [27] .gnu.lto_init_adj PROGBITS 00000000 aca834 0005db 00 0 0
4
+ [27] .gnu.lto_init_adj PROGBITS 00000000 aca834 0005d9 00 0 0
4
[28] .gnu.lto_.cgraph PROGBITS 00000000 acae10 0eaea1 00 0 0
4
[29] .gnu.lto_.statics PROGBITS 00000000 bb5cb4 002a22 00 0 0
4
- [30] .gnu.lto_.decls PROGBITS 00000000 bb86d8 1ecd2ce 00 0 0
4
(further all is different due to offset and size mismatches)
The offset difference of the section headers is odd as well.
Program headers are the same.
--
Summary: Bootstrap comparison fails, executables contain
.gnu.lto_* sections
Product: gcc
Version: lto
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41079
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug lto/41079] Bootstrap comparison fails, collect2 links against lto archives
2009-08-15 15:58 [Bug lto/41079] New: Bootstrap comparison fails, executables contain .gnu.lto_* sections rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-08-16 12:48 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-16 17:13 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-08-16 12:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-16 12:47 -------
The lto sections are because we link with the static libraries even if they
contain lto sections. As the linker doesn't know about them they are not
stripped either. I guess a linker script could help here ... or archive
support for lto.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Summary|Bootstrap comparison fails, |Bootstrap comparison fails,
|executables contain |collect2 links against lto
|.gnu.lto_* sections |archives
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41079
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug lto/41079] Bootstrap comparison fails, collect2 links against lto archives
2009-08-15 15:58 [Bug lto/41079] New: Bootstrap comparison fails, executables contain .gnu.lto_* sections rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-16 12:48 ` [Bug lto/41079] Bootstrap comparison fails, collect2 links against lto archives rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-08-16 17:13 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-16 18:42 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-08-16 17:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-16 17:13 -------
Like forcing -Wl,-Tltoscript if using GNU ld with ltoscript being
SECTIONS { /DISCARD/ : { *(.gnu.lto_*) } }
INSERT BEFORE .text
placing this in the std GCC private library path should be enough together
with adjusting the default specs.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41079
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug lto/41079] Bootstrap comparison fails, collect2 links against lto archives
2009-08-15 15:58 [Bug lto/41079] New: Bootstrap comparison fails, executables contain .gnu.lto_* sections rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-16 12:48 ` [Bug lto/41079] Bootstrap comparison fails, collect2 links against lto archives rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-16 17:13 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-08-16 18:42 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-17 16:14 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-08-16 18:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-16 18:42 -------
With that added to BOOT_LDFLAGS the cc1 binaries compare ok (the comparison
still fails as it only considers .o files which obviously differ).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41079
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug lto/41079] Bootstrap comparison fails, collect2 links against lto archives
2009-08-15 15:58 [Bug lto/41079] New: Bootstrap comparison fails, executables contain .gnu.lto_* sections rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2009-08-16 18:42 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-08-17 16:14 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-19 6:15 ` bje at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-08-17 16:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-17 16:13 -------
on x86_64-*-* the bootstrap comparison succeeds, even with lto sections in
the executables and .o files.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
GCC target triplet| |i?86-*-*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41079
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug lto/41079] Bootstrap comparison fails, collect2 links against lto archives
2009-08-15 15:58 [Bug lto/41079] New: Bootstrap comparison fails, executables contain .gnu.lto_* sections rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2009-08-17 16:14 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-08-19 6:15 ` bje at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-24 15:34 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-24 15:34 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: bje at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-08-19 6:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from bje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-19 06:14 -------
Confirmed.
--
bje at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2009-08-19 06:14:55
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41079
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug lto/41079] Bootstrap comparison fails, collect2 links against lto archives
2009-08-15 15:58 [Bug lto/41079] New: Bootstrap comparison fails, executables contain .gnu.lto_* sections rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2009-08-19 6:15 ` bje at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-08-24 15:34 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-24 15:34 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-08-24 15:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-24 15:34 -------
The bootstrap comparison issues have all been fixed. The lto sections
appearing in the final executables have been dealt with in upstream ld
following what gold does.
Thus, fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
GCC target triplet|i?86-*-* |
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41079
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug lto/41079] Bootstrap comparison fails, collect2 links against lto archives
2009-08-15 15:58 [Bug lto/41079] New: Bootstrap comparison fails, executables contain .gnu.lto_* sections rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2009-08-24 15:34 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-08-24 15:34 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-08-24 15:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-24 15:33 -------
Subject: Bug 41079
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Aug 24 15:33:35 2009
New Revision: 151057
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=151057
Log:
2009-08-24 Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de>
PR lto/41079
* lto-streamer-out.c (output_gimple_stmt): Only stream needed
fields. Do not stream pointer garbage.
* lto-streamer-in.c (output_gimple_stmt): Adjust accordingly.
Structure like output_gimple_stmt. Do not needlessly zero
fields.
Modified:
branches/lto/gcc/ChangeLog.lto
branches/lto/gcc/lto-streamer-in.c
branches/lto/gcc/lto-streamer-out.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41079
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-08-24 15:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-08-15 15:58 [Bug lto/41079] New: Bootstrap comparison fails, executables contain .gnu.lto_* sections rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-16 12:48 ` [Bug lto/41079] Bootstrap comparison fails, collect2 links against lto archives rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-16 17:13 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-16 18:42 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-17 16:14 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-19 6:15 ` bje at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-24 15:34 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-24 15:34 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).