From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8055 invoked by alias); 21 Aug 2009 18:16:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 7478 invoked by uid 48); 21 Aug 2009 18:16:30 -0000 Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 18:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090821181630.7477.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug debug/37738] Fortran DW_TAG_common_block has incorrect placement/scope In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-08/txt/msg01748.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #8 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-21 18:16 ------- (In reply to comment #7) > I have a request to emit a DW_TAG_common_inclusion record in our dwarf output > for Fortran named commons. [...] > I'm just curious about views on this and if gfortran has any plans to implement > support for DW_TAG_common_inclusion. Currently, there no plan to implement it; simply because there was no request for it and other items seem to be more important. I create PR 41143 to track this, but I do not think that anyone will do much about it any time soon - that includes thinking about how and whether to implement it. (But I might be wrong and it might get implemented/considered sooner than I think.) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37738