public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/40106] Time increase with inlining for the Polyhedron test air.f90
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 12:51:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090825125114.29518.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-40106-12313@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>



------- Comment #14 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr  2009-08-25 12:51 -------
> I don't think the issue is pow expansion.  

What I do see from different means is that the number of calls to pow()
increases from 63,907,869 to 1,953,139,629. Since pow() is not exactly cheap, I
think this could be sufficient to explain the 1.8s difference I see. Note that
the code has plenty of x**2 and x**a where a is real.

> Does -fno-ipa-cp fix the regression?

No.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40106


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-08-25 12:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-11 18:04 [Bug middle-end/40106] New: " dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-05-12 11:52 ` [Bug middle-end/40106] " hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-05-12 13:23 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-05-12 14:47 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2009-05-12 16:18 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-05-22 20:39 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-05-22 20:41 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-05-22 20:52 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-07-13 15:29 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-25 11:56 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-08-25 12:01 ` [Bug middle-end/40106] Time increase " dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-08-25 12:22 ` [Bug middle-end/40106] Time increase with inlining " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-25 12:30 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-08-25 12:40 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2009-08-25 12:51 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr [this message]
2009-08-25 15:31 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-08-25 21:25 ` [Bug middle-end/40106] Time increase for the Polyhedron test air.f90 due to bad optimization dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-08-27 21:59 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-08-28  1:09 ` howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
2009-08-28  5:39 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-08-28  7:19 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-08-28 12:01 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-08-28 12:23 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-08-28 13:36 ` howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
2009-08-31 13:06 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-08-31 15:04 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-08-31 15:21 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
2009-08-31 15:23 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2009-08-31 23:59 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-09-01  9:37 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-09-03  7:10 ` [Bug middle-end/40106] [4.4/4.5 Regression] " dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-09-03 11:20 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-09-06 22:15 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-09-18  8:58 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-10-15 12:49 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-10-18 13:22 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-12-15 16:40 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-21 13:16 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-02-25 17:20 ` [Bug middle-end/40106] [4.4/4.5 Regression] Weird interaction between optimize_insn_for_speed_p and -funsafe-math-optimizations dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-03-16 15:07 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-03-16 15:11 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2010-03-16 15:26 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-03-16 15:50 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-03-16 15:52 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2010-03-16 16:04 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-03-16 16:07 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2010-03-16 16:39 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-03-16 16:59 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-03-16 17:14 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-03-18 18:30 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-03-19 10:26 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-03-19 10:35 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-03-19 15:40 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-03-20 13:03 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-03-20 13:21 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-03-20 14:19 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2010-03-20 14:40 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-03-20 15:00 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-03-20 15:12 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-03-22 10:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-03-22 12:38 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-03-22 12:39 ` [Bug middle-end/40106] [4.4 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-03-25 17:38 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-30  9:01 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090825125114.29518.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).