public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/41298] wrong-code: Default initializer C_NULL_PTR ignored
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 16:07:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090908160650.13028.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-41298-13404@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>



------- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-09-08 16:06 -------
Regarding the initialization: Initializing proc pointers and pointers works.

The first time one hits gfc_conv_structure, one has:
  expr->expr_type == EXPR_STRUCTURE
for the type
  expr->ts->u.derived->name == "fgsl_file".
If one drills deeper, one finds another
  expr->value.constructor->expr->expr_type == EXPR_STRUCTURE
this time as expected of the type
  expr->value.constructor->expr->ts->u.derived->name == "c_ptr"
So far so good. Now one just needs to have an EXPR_NULL or EXPR_VARIABLE or
something like that -- but:
  expr->value.constructor->expr->value.constructor->expr == NULL

However, in gfc_conv_structure:
  for (c = expr->value.constructor; c; c = c->next, cm = cm->next)
    {
      if (!c->expr || cm->attr.allocatable)
        continue;

It shouldn't be NULL; if it weren't one could enter gfc_conv_initializer and
could enter there:
  if (expr != NULL && expr->ts.type == BT_DERIVED
      && expr->ts.is_iso_c && expr->ts.u.derived)
    expr = gfc_int_expr (0);

Thus the question is: Why is the last expr == NULL and not EXPR_VARIABLE of
flavour FL_PARAMETER?

 * * *

Another question: Why is there an
  if (file != 0)
I think it should always be true, unless sym is explicitly marked as optional.
Thus the following gives a nanosecond speed up and saves five bytes or so in
the file size (untested):

Index: trans-decl.c
===================================================================
--- trans-decl.c        (revision 151512)
+++ trans-decl.c        (working copy)
@@ -2992,7 +2992,7 @@ gfc_init_default_dt (gfc_symbol * sym, t
   gfc_set_sym_referenced (sym);
   e = gfc_lval_expr_from_sym (sym);
   tmp = gfc_trans_assignment (e, sym->value, false);
-  if (sym->attr.dummy)
+  if (sym->attr.dummy && sym->attr.optional)
     {
       present = gfc_conv_expr_present (sym);
       tmp = build3 (COND_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (tmp), present,
@@ -3030,9 +3030,12 @@ init_intent_out_dt (gfc_symbol * proc_sy
                                             f->sym->backend_decl,
                                             f->sym->as ? f->sym->as->rank :
0);

-           present = gfc_conv_expr_present (f->sym);
-           tmp = build3 (COND_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (tmp), present,
-                         tmp, build_empty_stmt (input_location));
+           if (f->sym->attr.optional)
+             {
+               present = gfc_conv_expr_present (f->sym);
+               tmp = build3 (COND_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (tmp), present,
+                             tmp, build_empty_stmt (input_location));
+             }

            gfc_add_expr_to_block (&fnblock, tmp);
          }


-- 

burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|wrong-code: Default         |wrong-code: Default
                   |initializer ignored         |initializer C_NULL_PTR
                   |                            |ignored


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41298


  reply	other threads:[~2009-09-08 16:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-07 16:24 [Bug fortran/41298] New: wrong-code: Default initializer ignored burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-09-08 16:07 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message]
2009-09-09 20:42 ` [Bug fortran/41298] wrong-code: Default initializer C_NULL_PTR ignored mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-09-10  1:09 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-09-10  2:44 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-12-13 16:22 ` dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-06 21:49 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-09  9:12 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-09  9:12 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-02-07  4:02 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090908160650.13028.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).