public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "ami_stuff at o2 dot pl" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/40454] [4.4 regression] zlib is about 20% slower when compiled with GCC 4.4.1
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:58:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090910125803.10173.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-40454-17839@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
------- Comment #16 from ami_stuff at o2 dot pl 2009-09-10 12:58 -------
cputime minigzip_412_O1 testa.tif - 34.336
cputime minigzip_412_O2 testa.tif - 34.499
cputime minigzip_412_O3 testa.tif - 34.257
cputime minigzip_425_O1 testa.tif - 36.474
cputime minigzip_425_O2 testa.tif - 35.650
cputime minigzip_425_O3 testa.tif - 35.912
cputime minigzip_432_O1 testa.tif - 39.166
cputime minigzip_432_O2 testa.tif - 35.005
cputime minigzip_432_O3 testa.tif - 38.114
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40454
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-10 12:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-15 23:36 [Bug c/40454] New: GCC 4.4.0 vs 3.4.0 - PNGCrush is about 20% slower when compiled with GCC 4.4.0 ami_stuff at o2 dot pl
2009-06-18 11:28 ` [Bug c/40454] " ami_stuff at o2 dot pl
2009-08-12 12:10 ` ami_stuff at o2 dot pl
2009-08-16 1:28 ` ami_stuff at o2 dot pl
2009-08-16 14:03 ` ami_stuff at o2 dot pl
2009-08-17 8:42 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
2009-08-17 9:21 ` ami_stuff at o2 dot pl
2009-08-17 9:21 ` ami_stuff at o2 dot pl
2009-08-17 9:22 ` ami_stuff at o2 dot pl
2009-08-17 9:23 ` ami_stuff at o2 dot pl
2009-08-17 9:23 ` ami_stuff at o2 dot pl
2009-08-17 9:26 ` ami_stuff at o2 dot pl
2009-08-17 13:30 ` [Bug c/40454] GCC 4.4.0 vs 3.4.0 - at -O3, " bonzini at gnu dot org
2009-08-17 15:17 ` ami_stuff at o2 dot pl
2009-09-03 7:27 ` [Bug target/40454] [4.4 regression] zlib is about 20% slower when compiled with GCC 4.4.1 bonzini at gnu dot org
2009-09-07 19:22 ` ami_stuff at o2 dot pl
2009-09-10 12:58 ` ami_stuff at o2 dot pl [this message]
2009-09-20 12:16 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-10-15 12:56 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-21 13:19 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-30 9:01 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
[not found] <bug-40454-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2010-10-01 12:00 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-31 21:56 ` t.artem at mailcity dot com
2011-04-16 10:46 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090910125803.10173.qmail@sourceware.org \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).