public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug bootstrap/41386]  New: incorrect configure results in "The following requested languages could not be built: lto"
@ 2009-09-17  6:20 marcus at jet dot franken dot de
  2009-09-17  9:50 ` [Bug bootstrap/41386] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: marcus at jet dot franken dot de @ 2009-09-17  6:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

$ make
CONFIG_SHELL="/bin/sh" /bin/sh ./config.status --recheck
running CONFIG_SHELL=/bin/sh /bin/sh /gcc/lto/configure --prefix=/gcc/lto/BIN/
--enable-lto --enable-languages=c,lto,lto --no-create --no-recursion
...
configure: error:
The following requested languages could not be built: lto
Supported languages are: c,c++,fortran,java,lto,objc,obj-c++
make: *** [config.status] Error 1
$ 

It looks like its confused by the multiple ,lto


-- 
           Summary: incorrect configure results in "The following requested
                    languages could not be built: lto"
           Product: gcc
           Version: lto
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: bootstrap
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: marcus at jet dot franken dot de


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41386


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug bootstrap/41386] incorrect configure results in "The following requested languages could not be built: lto"
  2009-09-17  6:20 [Bug bootstrap/41386] New: incorrect configure results in "The following requested languages could not be built: lto" marcus at jet dot franken dot de
@ 2009-09-17  9:50 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-09-17 12:04 ` marcus at jet dot franken dot de
  2009-09-20 16:39 ` marcus at jet dot franken dot de
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-09-17  9:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-09-17 09:50 -------
Is it?  I guess the check for libelf fails instead, no?


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41386


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug bootstrap/41386] incorrect configure results in "The following requested languages could not be built: lto"
  2009-09-17  6:20 [Bug bootstrap/41386] New: incorrect configure results in "The following requested languages could not be built: lto" marcus at jet dot franken dot de
  2009-09-17  9:50 ` [Bug bootstrap/41386] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-09-17 12:04 ` marcus at jet dot franken dot de
  2009-09-20 16:39 ` marcus at jet dot franken dot de
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: marcus at jet dot franken dot de @ 2009-09-17 12:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #2 from marcus at jet dot franken dot de  2009-09-17 12:04 -------
Created an attachment (id=18600)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18600&action=view)
config.log

config.log from such a run (a different machine, same result).

libelf seems fine


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41386


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug bootstrap/41386] incorrect configure results in "The following requested languages could not be built: lto"
  2009-09-17  6:20 [Bug bootstrap/41386] New: incorrect configure results in "The following requested languages could not be built: lto" marcus at jet dot franken dot de
  2009-09-17  9:50 ` [Bug bootstrap/41386] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-09-17 12:04 ` marcus at jet dot franken dot de
@ 2009-09-20 16:39 ` marcus at jet dot franken dot de
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: marcus at jet dot franken dot de @ 2009-09-20 16:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #3 from marcus at jet dot franken dot de  2009-09-20 16:39 -------
hmm, if I rerun: configure --enable-lto --enable-languages=c   it works

perhaps the auto reconfig logic was broken a bit


-- 

marcus at jet dot franken dot de changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WORKSFORME


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41386


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-09-20 16:39 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-09-17  6:20 [Bug bootstrap/41386] New: incorrect configure results in "The following requested languages could not be built: lto" marcus at jet dot franken dot de
2009-09-17  9:50 ` [Bug bootstrap/41386] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-09-17 12:04 ` marcus at jet dot franken dot de
2009-09-20 16:39 ` marcus at jet dot franken dot de

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).