From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24109 invoked by alias); 20 Sep 2009 16:37:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 24061 invoked by uid 48); 20 Sep 2009 16:36:58 -0000 Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 16:37:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090920163658.24060.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug bootstrap/41405] [4.5 Regression] Bootstrap fails at revision 151873 on *-apple-darwin9 In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg01893.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #16 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-20 16:36 ------- > As far as I understand the problem, I do not see why tools not designed to > accept "dwarf_version 4" can be blamed for that (it would be like blaming the > CD player in my car for not reading MP3 CDs). But you would complain to them if it was eating your MP3 CDs, right? ;) As specified they should ignore dwarf codes they do not understand, not assert on them. Please if you care report this issue to apple (it's probably enough to send them along a file that crashes their tool). Instead of reverting the patch we should add a -gstrict-dwarf[23] switch that darwin can use by default instead. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2009-09-20 16:36:58 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41405