From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15529 invoked by alias); 20 Sep 2009 21:17:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 15472 invoked by uid 48); 20 Sep 2009 21:16:52 -0000 Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 21:17:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090920211652.15471.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c/41182] [4.5 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected integer_cst, have nop_expr in tree_int_cst_lt, at tree.c:5259 In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg01947.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-20 21:16 ------- We likely should recursively fold all trees during gimplification. That also would prepare us to no longer fold in the frontends. Didn't we do this at some point in the past? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41182