public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "ubizjak at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/41089] [4.5 Regression] r147980 (New SRA) breaks stdargs
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 21:09:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090927210938.6236.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-41089-1649@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
------- Comment #29 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-09-27 21:09 -------
(In reply to comment #28)
> Uros, did you fix the alpha backend vaarg gimplification yet?
Hm, I'm not aware of anything broken with gimplification (judging by the fact
that it worked until recent changes)... The only patch I have is the one from
Comment 21, and doesn't make any difference with the problem, reported in this
PR.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41089
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-27 21:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-17 11:35 [Bug tree-optimization/41089] New: " ubizjak at gmail dot com
2009-08-17 12:16 ` [Bug tree-optimization/41089] " ubizjak at gmail dot com
2009-08-17 12:19 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2009-08-25 15:51 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-25 21:53 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-31 9:04 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-09-04 18:45 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-09-04 18:59 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-09-04 19:01 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-09-04 19:06 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-09-04 21:03 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2009-09-05 6:08 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2009-09-08 17:11 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-09-09 14:45 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2009-09-09 16:06 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-09-09 16:23 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2009-09-09 16:51 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-09-10 8:48 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2009-09-10 8:50 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2009-09-10 10:04 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2009-09-10 10:14 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-09-10 10:18 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-09-10 17:29 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2009-09-10 18:38 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2009-09-10 18:39 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2009-09-10 21:42 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-09-10 22:00 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-09-10 22:12 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-09-18 9:03 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-09-18 15:45 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2009-09-27 16:13 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2009-09-27 18:51 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-09-27 21:09 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com [this message]
2009-09-28 8:41 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2009-09-29 13:49 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-21 20:26 ` [Bug tree-optimization/41089] [4.5 Regression] stdarg pass produces wrong code ubizjak at gmail dot com
2010-01-22 11:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-22 12:33 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2010-01-22 14:17 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-22 17:26 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2010-01-22 19:05 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-22 19:17 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-22 21:47 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2010-01-22 22:50 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-22 22:58 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-23 8:14 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-23 12:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-02-17 17:21 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-06 11:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-31 9:33 ` [Bug tree-optimization/41089] [4.5/4.6 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-08-01 12:50 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2010-08-02 17:13 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2010-08-02 17:33 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2010-08-03 18:45 ` uros at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-08-03 18:53 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2010-08-03 18:56 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090927210938.6236.qmail@sourceware.org \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).