From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6152 invoked by alias); 29 Sep 2009 13:49:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 6098 invoked by uid 48); 29 Sep 2009 13:49:17 -0000 Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:49:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090929134917.6097.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/41089] [4.5 Regression] r147980 (New SRA) breaks stdargs In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg02624.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #31 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-29 13:49 ------- (In reply to comment #12) > Thus I believe SRA has nothing to > do with these remaining failures. If you want to confirm this > independently, compile them with -fno-tree-sra. > ...and so I un-assign this bug from myself. -- jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot |unassigned at gcc dot gnu |org |dot org Status|ASSIGNED |NEW http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41089