From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12792 invoked by alias); 1 Oct 2009 15:55:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 12674 invoked by uid 48); 1 Oct 2009 15:55:41 -0000 Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 15:55:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20091001155541.12673.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c++/41313] g++.dg/tree-prof/partition1.C compilation and execution test failures on *-apple-darwin* In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-10/txt/msg00032.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #17 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-10-01 15:55 ------- (In reply to comment #15) > Yeah, the patch in #11 is about the right for half the problem (darwin10), if > it weren't for ld's warning message. I don't know quite why it is doing that, > so guess we'll just have to nix that idea. So, the next best thing would be to > just turn off hot/cold partitioning for darwin. In override_option in > darwin.c, just do hot_cold = 0. > Won't disabling hot/cold partitioning for darwin potentially degrade the code generation at -O3 or is this issue limited to -freorder-blocks-and-partition only? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41313