From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5895 invoked by alias); 7 Oct 2009 22:35:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 5589 invoked by uid 48); 7 Oct 2009 22:35:03 -0000 Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 22:35:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20091007223503.5587.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug bootstrap/37739] [4.4 Regression] bootstrap broken with core gcc > gcc-4.2.x In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "amodra at bigpond dot net dot au" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-10/txt/msg00645.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #36 from amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2009-10-07 22:35 ------- Andreas, there is no way this bug can be fixed 100% in gcc, except perhaps if you are willing to compile -static. Source and/or compiler fixes only work to the extent that they limit code+data size to less than 33M. If you go over that size, and are using the old-style bss plt with .eh_frame data, then you start playing russian roulette. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37739