From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17023 invoked by alias); 8 Oct 2009 21:26:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 16927 invoked by uid 48); 8 Oct 2009 21:26:32 -0000 Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2009 21:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20091008212632.16926.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug lto/41529] [4.5 Regression] LTO configuration should detect if the target is ELF In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-10/txt/msg00718.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-08 21:26 ------- I installed libelf on a i386-darwin machine at /usr/local so I could build a cross compiler to spu-elf and test LTO on my laptop. And now a native build of GCC picks up libelf and we get: checking for the correct version of libelf... yes The following languages will be built: c,lto,c++,fortran,java,objc So this is a regression. I will report how it fails later on. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|LTO configuration should |[4.5 Regression] LTO |detect if the target is ELF |configuration should detect | |if the target is ELF Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41529