From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25452 invoked by alias); 12 Oct 2009 16:07:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 25377 invoked by uid 48); 12 Oct 2009 16:06:49 -0000 Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 16:07:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20091012160649.25376.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug testsuite/41659] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20090914-2 c_lto_20090914-2_0.o assemble, -O0 -fwhopr In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "janis at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-10/txt/msg01037.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #2 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-12 16:06 ------- It doesn't have the desired or expected effect, just the documented effect. >>From the GCC internals manual section 6.4.6 Support for testing link-time optimizations: "Unlike dg-do, dg-lto-do does not support an optional `target' or `xfail' list. Use dg-skip-if, dg-xfail-if, or dg-xfail-run-if." That's rather obscure. For now I'll make it an error and then later maybe I'll have time to support target and xfail for dg-lto-do. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41659