From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14957 invoked by alias); 14 Oct 2009 04:50:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 14891 invoked by uid 48); 14 Oct 2009 04:50:43 -0000 Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 04:50:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20091014045043.14890.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c++/41091] Using section attribute in c and c++ function causes section type conflict In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-10/txt/msg01180.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-14 04:50 ------- Actually, they have to have two different section types. c::m()::TWO has to be in the comdat section for C::m(). While c()::ONE does not and can be in a normal section. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41091