public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/40434] New: g++ does not obey 8.3.5p5?!
@ 2009-06-13 16:22 d3607773 at bsnow dot net
2009-06-13 16:23 ` [Bug c++/40434] " d3607773 at bsnow dot net
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: d3607773 at bsnow dot net @ 2009-06-13 16:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
Hello
line 14 of the attached code does compile fine on gcc 4.4.0, although it should
not according to 8.3.5p5 (pair(pair&& __p):
first(std::move(__p.first)),second(std::move(__p.second)) { } get triggered -
afaik this no exception to the rule)
Is this a bug or am I missing something?
Thank you
--
Summary: g++ does not obey 8.3.5p5?!
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: d3607773 at bsnow dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40434
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/40434] g++ does not obey 8.3.5p5?! 2009-06-13 16:22 [Bug c++/40434] New: g++ does not obey 8.3.5p5?! d3607773 at bsnow dot net @ 2009-06-13 16:23 ` d3607773 at bsnow dot net 2009-06-13 16:23 ` [Bug c++/40434] [C++0x] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (3 subsequent siblings) 4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: d3607773 at bsnow dot net @ 2009-06-13 16:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #1 from d3607773 at bsnow dot net 2009-06-13 16:23 ------- Created an attachment (id=17991) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17991&action=view) testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40434 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/40434] [C++0x] g++ does not obey 8.3.5p5?! 2009-06-13 16:22 [Bug c++/40434] New: g++ does not obey 8.3.5p5?! d3607773 at bsnow dot net 2009-06-13 16:23 ` [Bug c++/40434] " d3607773 at bsnow dot net @ 2009-06-13 16:23 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-15 12:06 ` jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com ` (2 subsequent siblings) 4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-06-13 16:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|major |normal Summary|g++ does not obey 8.3.5p5?! |[C++0x] g++ does not obey | |8.3.5p5?! http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40434 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/40434] [C++0x] g++ does not obey 8.3.5p5?! 2009-06-13 16:22 [Bug c++/40434] New: g++ does not obey 8.3.5p5?! d3607773 at bsnow dot net 2009-06-13 16:23 ` [Bug c++/40434] " d3607773 at bsnow dot net 2009-06-13 16:23 ` [Bug c++/40434] [C++0x] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-06-15 12:06 ` jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com 2009-10-19 0:19 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-26 13:57 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com @ 2009-06-15 12:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #2 from jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com 2009-06-15 12:06 ------- 8.3.5p5? is that reference right? and I assume you mean line 10, not line 14. The pair(pair&&) constructor is not in the WP. Commenting it out causes the pair(pair<U,V>&&) constructor to be used, which fails to compile (as with the next line.) -- jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot | |com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40434 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/40434] [C++0x] g++ does not obey 8.3.5p5?! 2009-06-13 16:22 [Bug c++/40434] New: g++ does not obey 8.3.5p5?! d3607773 at bsnow dot net ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2009-06-15 12:06 ` jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com @ 2009-10-19 0:19 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-26 13:57 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: jason at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-10-19 0:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #3 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-19 00:19 ------- pair(pair&&) is in the WP now. 4.5 gives no errors for the testcase, which I believe is correct; it's OK to bind an rvalue to a const lvalue reference. -- jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40434 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/40434] [C++0x] g++ does not obey 8.3.5p5?! 2009-06-13 16:22 [Bug c++/40434] New: g++ does not obey 8.3.5p5?! d3607773 at bsnow dot net ` (3 preceding siblings ...) 2009-10-19 0:19 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-12-26 13:57 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com @ 2009-12-26 13:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #4 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-12-26 13:57 ------- Works fine in mainline indeed. -- paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution| |WORKSFORME Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40434 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-12-26 13:57 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2009-06-13 16:22 [Bug c++/40434] New: g++ does not obey 8.3.5p5?! d3607773 at bsnow dot net 2009-06-13 16:23 ` [Bug c++/40434] " d3607773 at bsnow dot net 2009-06-13 16:23 ` [Bug c++/40434] [C++0x] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-15 12:06 ` jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com 2009-10-19 0:19 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-26 13:57 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).