From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25805 invoked by alias); 30 Oct 2009 02:52:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 25772 invoked by uid 48); 30 Oct 2009 02:51:58 -0000 Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 02:52:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20091030025158.25771.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug libstdc++/41351] std::rotate on RAI does not conform to ISO complexity requirement In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-10/txt/msg02507.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #36 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-10-30 02:51 ------- First, send it to me and Benjamin (bkoz@redhat.com), because we want to be 100% sure everything is ok. Then, start thinking about the fix ;) Really, please-please, keep it minimal, we don't want for now the super-dupe algorithm, we want something using only swaps and not regressing performance-wise wrt what we have now. And clear, easy to understand. Additional testcases are always welcome. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41351