From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-298022-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 16808 invoked by alias); 30 Oct 2009 22:42:08 -0000
Received: (qmail 16775 invoked by alias); 30 Oct 2009 22:41:56 -0000
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 22:42:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20091030224156.16774.qmail@sourceware.org>
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
References: <bug-41881-3264@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/41881] Complete unrolling (inner) versus vectorization of reduction
In-Reply-To: <bug-41881-3264@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
From: "drow at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-10/txt/msg02584.txt.bz2



------- Comment #3 from drow at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-10-30 22:41 -------
Subject: Re:  Complete unrolling (inner)
 versus vectorization of reduction

On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 10:20:46PM -0000, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> You could use -O2 -ftree-vectorize.

No:

static bool
gate_tree_complete_unroll_inner (void)
{
  return optimize >= 2;
}


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41881