From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-298823-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 30121 invoked by alias); 8 Nov 2009 20:38:58 -0000
Received: (qmail 29839 invoked by alias); 8 Nov 2009 20:38:49 -0000
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2009 20:38:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20091108203849.29838.qmail@sourceware.org>
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
References: <bug-41990-11100@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Subject: [Bug c/41990] Incorrect stack setup on x86_64
In-Reply-To: <bug-41990-11100@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
From: "cube at cubidou dot net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-11/txt/msg00736.txt.bz2



------- Comment #4 from cube at cubidou dot net  2009-11-08 20:38 -------
Subject: Re:  Incorrect stack setup on x86_64

On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 08:37:25PM -0000, cube at cubidou dot net wrote:
[...]
> 152 is too small even for the total size of the local variables (268 in

I meant 260 here.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41990