From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 501 invoked by alias); 11 Nov 2009 13:52:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 445 invoked by uid 48); 11 Nov 2009 13:52:04 -0000 Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:52:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20091111135204.444.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug bootstrap/42002] Bootstrap failure: ld doesn't find 64-bit libelf on Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "lucier at math dot purdue dot edu" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-11/txt/msg00916.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #2 from lucier at math dot purdue dot edu 2009-11-11 13:52 ------- Thanks a lot for the explanation! I'm looking through the list of packages on Fedora with elfutils in the title; there is no elfutils-libelf-devel.ppc64, but the only ppc64 packages I can find are elfutils-devel-0.142-1.fc11 (ppc64) with file list /usr/include/dwarf.h /usr/include/elfutils /usr/include/elfutils/elf-knowledge.h /usr/include/elfutils/libasm.h /usr/include/elfutils/libdw.h /usr/include/elfutils/libdwfl.h /usr/include/elfutils/libebl.h /usr/include/elfutils/version.h /usr/lib64/libasm.so /usr/lib64/libdw.so /usr/lib64/libebl.a and elfutils-libelf-0.142-1.fc11 (ppc64) with file list /usr/lib64/libelf-0.142.so /usr/lib64/libelf.so.1 So I put in the link from libelf.so to libelf.so.1 by hand and the bootstrap is proceeding. Should I file a bug report with Fedora? I was told Fedora 12 won't support ppc64, so maybe there's no point. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42002