public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug debug/41988] [4.5 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/debug/*.C -gdwarf-2 -g1 (internal compiler error)
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:57:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091113165648.23832.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-41988-12313@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>



------- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-11-13 16:56 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> Is this a regression or a new test? They are OK on Linux.
> 
> BTW, stack alignment was checked in a long time ago. 

The tests are old, they are from 2003 :).
The patch which I was talking about was:
2009-10-30  H.J. Lu  <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>

        PR target/40838
        * cfgexpand.c (expand_stack_alignment): Call update_stack_boundary
        first.  Move assert on stack_alignment_estimated just before
        setting stack_realign_needed.
        (gimple_expand_cfg): Initialize stack_alignment_estimated to 0.
        Don't call update_stack_boundary.

        * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_minimum_incoming_stack_boundary): New.
        (verride_options): Don't check ix86_force_align_arg_pointer here.
        (ix86_function_ok_for_sibcall): Use it.
        (ix86_update_stack_boundary): Likewise.

        * config/i386/i386.h (STACK_REALIGN_DEFAULT): Update comments.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41988


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-11-13 16:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-08 14:25 [Bug debug/41988] New: " dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-11-08 15:25 ` [Bug debug/41988] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-11-08 17:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-11-13 15:11 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2009-11-13 16:45 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2009-11-13 16:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message]
2009-11-13 16:58 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-11-13 20:23 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2009-11-13 20:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-11-13 20:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-11-13 20:38 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2009-11-13 20:44 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-11-22 22:11 ` howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
2009-11-22 22:27 ` howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
2009-11-22 22:32 ` howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
2009-11-23  0:16 ` howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
2009-11-23  0:31 ` howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
2009-11-23  1:01 ` howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
2009-11-25 21:12 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-11-27 11:13 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-12-01 17:28 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-12-01 22:07 ` howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
2009-12-01 23:21 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-12-02  2:19 ` howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
2009-12-02  2:24 ` howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
2009-12-02  3:45 ` howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
2009-12-02  6:16 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-12-02 14:45 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-12-02 14:52 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-12-03  5:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091113165648.23832.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).