From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26917 invoked by alias); 13 Nov 2009 21:16:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 26828 invoked by alias); 13 Nov 2009 21:16:29 -0000 Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 21:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20091113211629.26827.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c++/42033] libstdc++ seems to miss std::basic_string, std::allocator >::basic_string(char*, char*, std::allocator const&) In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "hubicka at ucw dot cz" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-11/txt/msg01152.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #5 from hubicka at ucw dot cz 2009-11-13 21:16 ------- Subject: Re: libstdc++ seems to miss std::basic_string, std::allocator >::basic_string(char*, char*, std::allocator const&) > I see. Seems a compiler problem indeed, because, as Jason mentioned, the > template is explicitly instantiated in string-inst.cc and marked to be exported > in the linker script for the *.so. I have no idea what libstdc++ could do to > fix this... I am confused why I get link error given that even my *.a exports the symbol... Honza -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42033