From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-299315-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 5585 invoked by alias); 15 Nov 2009 15:12:37 -0000
Received: (qmail 5557 invoked by uid 48); 15 Nov 2009 15:12:23 -0000
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 15:12:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20091115151223.5556.qmail@sourceware.org>
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
References: <bug-42048-16146@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Subject: [Bug fortran/42048] [F03] Erroneous syntax error message on TBP call
In-Reply-To: <bug-42048-16146@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
From: "janus at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-11/txt/msg01228.txt.bz2



------- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-11-15 15:12 -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> Besides, it probably fails for strange constructions such as

Another thing that does not work is:

 type(field) function new_field()
  ! ...
 end function

 subroutine test
   call new_field()%mesh%new_grid()
 end subroutine

OTOH, is this even valid?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42048