public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/6259] Explicit instantiation of template constructor not allowed [not found] <bug-6259-184@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> @ 2005-11-14 15:38 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-24 21:52 ` bangerth at gmail dot com ` (2 subsequent siblings) 3 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-11-14 15:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-14 15:38 ------- *** Bug 24848 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |seefeld at sympatico dot ca http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6259 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/6259] Explicit instantiation of template constructor not allowed [not found] <bug-6259-184@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2005-11-14 15:38 ` [Bug c++/6259] Explicit instantiation of template constructor not allowed pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-11-24 21:52 ` bangerth at gmail dot com 2009-11-24 23:09 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-28 11:03 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 3 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: bangerth at gmail dot com @ 2009-11-24 21:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #7 from bangerth at gmail dot com 2009-11-24 21:52 ------- Jason, is this PR related to your recent work on injecting class names into scopes? I don't know what makes gcc reject the constructor specialization, but it seems to me that it might be because it parses the X<> part of template X::X<> (T<2> &) as a class name with an invalid template argument list, rather than as the constructor name. W. -- bangerth at gmail dot com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6259 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/6259] Explicit instantiation of template constructor not allowed [not found] <bug-6259-184@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2005-11-14 15:38 ` [Bug c++/6259] Explicit instantiation of template constructor not allowed pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-24 21:52 ` bangerth at gmail dot com @ 2009-11-24 23:09 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-28 11:03 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 3 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: jason at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-11-24 23:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #8 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-24 23:09 ------- Yep, fixed for 4.5. -- jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6259 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/6259] Explicit instantiation of template constructor not allowed [not found] <bug-6259-184@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2009-11-24 23:09 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-11-28 11:03 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 3 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-11-28 11:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #9 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-28 11:03 ------- Just for further reference: This was fixed by the patch for PR 9050. -- reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6259 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20020411095602.6259.wolfgang.bangerth@iwr.uni-heidelberg.de>]
* [Bug c++/6259] Explicit instantiation of template constructor not allowed [not found] <20020411095602.6259.wolfgang.bangerth@iwr.uni-heidelberg.de> @ 2003-11-20 10:36 ` mattyt at tpg dot com dot au 2003-12-23 9:26 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (2 subsequent siblings) 3 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: mattyt at tpg dot com dot au @ 2003-11-20 10:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Additional Comments From mattyt at tpg dot com dot au 2003-11-20 10:36 ------- I had this problem too, a template constructor in a template class. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mattyt at tpg dot com dot au http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6259 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/6259] Explicit instantiation of template constructor not allowed [not found] <20020411095602.6259.wolfgang.bangerth@iwr.uni-heidelberg.de> 2003-11-20 10:36 ` mattyt at tpg dot com dot au @ 2003-12-23 9:26 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-12-28 5:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-05 2:27 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 3 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-12-23 9:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-12-23 08:46 ------- The error message has changed on the mainline and looks better: tests/pr6259.cc:6: error: `X' is not a template tests/pr6259.cc:6: error: expected `)' tests/pr6259.cc:6: error: abstract declarator `X' used as declaration tests/pr6259.cc:6: error: explicit instantiation of non-template `X $_0' tests/pr6259.cc:6: error: expected `;' I know that the follow works as expected: template <int dim> struct T {}; struct X { template <int dim> X (T<dim> &) {}; }; template X::X (T<2> &); -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6259 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/6259] Explicit instantiation of template constructor not allowed [not found] <20020411095602.6259.wolfgang.bangerth@iwr.uni-heidelberg.de> 2003-11-20 10:36 ` mattyt at tpg dot com dot au 2003-12-23 9:26 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-12-28 5:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-05 2:27 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 3 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-12-28 5:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-12-28 05:06 ------- Very much related to bug 9050 and 10832. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6259 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/6259] Explicit instantiation of template constructor not allowed [not found] <20020411095602.6259.wolfgang.bangerth@iwr.uni-heidelberg.de> ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2003-12-28 5:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-08-05 2:27 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 3 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-08-05 2:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-05 02:27 ------- We now get: pr6259.cc:7: error: `X' is not a template pr6259.cc:7: error: expected `)' before '&' token -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6259 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-11-28 11:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-6259-184@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-11-14 15:38 ` [Bug c++/6259] Explicit instantiation of template constructor not allowed pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-11-24 21:52 ` bangerth at gmail dot com
2009-11-24 23:09 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-11-28 11:03 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
[not found] <20020411095602.6259.wolfgang.bangerth@iwr.uni-heidelberg.de>
2003-11-20 10:36 ` mattyt at tpg dot com dot au
2003-12-23 9:26 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-12-28 5:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-08-05 2:27 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).