public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/42131] Weird translation of DO loops
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 22:07:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091126220716.21585.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-42131-10053@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
------- Comment #14 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-26 22:07 -------
(In reply to comment #13)
> }
> countm1.1 = (((character(kind=4)) D.1338 - (character(kind=4)) D.1337) *
> (character(kind=4)) step_sign.2) / (character(kind=4)) (step_sign.2 * D.1339);
>
> implementing the multiplication idea outlined above, and passes at
> least do_3.F90.
>
> Better?
Looks much better than the current situation. Is there a valid
reason for the character(kind=4) casts? I would have thought
that this should be a integer(kind=4).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42131
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-26 22:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-21 13:58 [Bug fortran/42131] New: " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-11-21 16:26 ` [Bug fortran/42131] " kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-11-21 17:33 ` toon at moene dot org
2009-11-21 18:31 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-11-21 19:24 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-11-21 21:41 ` toon at moene dot org
2009-11-21 23:07 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-11-21 23:24 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2009-11-21 23:42 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-11-22 10:21 ` toon at moene dot org
2009-11-22 19:04 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-11-23 21:48 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-11-24 18:04 ` toon at moene dot org
2009-11-26 21:56 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-11-26 22:07 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message]
2009-11-26 23:43 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-11-27 8:29 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-11-27 9:47 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2009-11-27 9:48 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2009-11-28 15:16 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-11-30 7:31 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-11-30 10:10 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2009-11-30 19:16 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-11-30 20:19 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-11-30 20:36 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-11-30 21:01 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-12-01 9:42 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2009-12-01 18:33 ` jb at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-12-02 9:23 ` jb at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-12-04 14:24 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091126220716.21585.qmail@sourceware.org \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).