From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25161 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2009 08:29:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 24156 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2009 08:29:19 -0000 Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 08:29:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20091127082919.24155.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/42131] Weird translation of DO loops In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-11/txt/msg02303.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #16 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-27 08:29 ------- (In reply to comment #12) > > Any tricks I have missed? > Yes - we could provide for loop versioning in the front end. [...] > ELSE > ABORT "M3 MUST NOT BE ZERO" > ENDIF Just for completeness a zeroness check is done for -fcheck=do: Fortran runtime error: DO step value is zero -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42131