From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25894 invoked by alias); 30 Nov 2009 09:57:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 25870 invoked by uid 48); 30 Nov 2009 09:57:39 -0000 Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:57:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20091130095739.25869.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c++/42194] performance degradation with STL complex convolution operation In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "jagjeet dot nain at gmail dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-11/txt/msg02575.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #2 from jagjeet dot nain at gmail dot com 2009-11-30 09:57 ------- Will -fcx-limited-range or -fcx-fortran-rules change the results compared to compiled with 4.0.2 without these flags ? Or in otherwords, A complex division program compiled with and without -fcx-limited-range flag of gcc 4.3.3, will results differ ? with regards J. S. Nain -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42194