From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1042 invoked by alias); 1 Dec 2009 09:58:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 979 invoked by uid 48); 1 Dec 2009 09:58:01 -0000 Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 09:58:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20091201095801.978.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/42216] [4.5 Regression] rev 15458[78] regress 464.h264ref peak 20% In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-12/txt/msg00023.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-01 09:58 ------- It was indeed Bernds patch. Bernd - the patch discription suggested it was a compile-time performance fix and not going to change code? There is quite big effect (including this negative one) on SPEC CPU 2006 on x86_64 ... -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bernds at gcc dot gnu dot | |org Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2009-12-01 09:58:01 date| | Summary|[4.5 Regression] 464.h264ref|[4.5 Regression] rev |peak regressed 20% |15458[78] regress | |464.h264ref peak 20% http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42216