From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19181 invoked by alias); 1 Dec 2009 22:50:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 19112 invoked by uid 48); 1 Dec 2009 22:50:12 -0000 Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 22:50:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20091201225012.19111.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug target/42240] wrong epilogue on naked function In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "a dot kaiser at gmx dot net" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-12/txt/msg00112.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #8 from a dot kaiser at gmx dot net 2009-12-01 22:50 ------- For the ARM target, falling off the end of the function does not make sense anyway, since the last byte usually is followed by the constant pool. So the AVR target finally caught up with the ARM target and doesn't work that way either. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42240