From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18271 invoked by alias); 4 Dec 2009 22:07:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 14409 invoked by uid 48); 4 Dec 2009 22:07:45 -0000 Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 22:07:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20091204220745.14408.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/29962] Initialization expressions In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-12/txt/msg00446.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #20 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-04 22:07 ------- Transformational intrinsics, done are: * all, any, count * product, sum * dot_product, matmul, transpose * pack, unpack, spread Left: * maxloc, minloc * maxval, minval (generic case) * cshift, eoshift While at it, see also PR29600 (kind arguments) and PR36313 (character type). Earlier this year, I was working on the cshift/eoshift, but I strongly believe that the linear list that builds the constructor must be replaced with splay trees before this can be implemented somewhat efficiently. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29962