From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15289 invoked by alias); 7 Dec 2009 16:19:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 15246 invoked by uid 48); 7 Dec 2009 16:19:41 -0000 Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2009 16:19:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20091207161941.15245.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug debug/42288] please emit empty .debug_aranges section In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "rth at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-12/txt/msg00703.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #4 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-07 16:19 ------- Created an attachment (id=19249) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19249&action=view) Proposed patch For the record, this is all that's needed for the above output. I see quite a few gdb regressions vs F12 system compiler. I suppose that could just be gcc 4.5, but since F12 also includes VTA I would hope that would not be the case... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42288