public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/40377] New: gfortran documentation: Add note to C prog. part + update F200x status
@ 2009-06-08 7:03 burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-06-08 19:03 ` [Bug fortran/40377] " burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-06-08 7:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
The GNU Fortran manual should mention in the mixed-language programming section
that
C's A[i][j]
matches
Fortran's A(j,i)
and that A(j+1,i) follows A(j,i) in memory.
Cf. http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gfortran/Mixed_002dLanguage-Programming.html
* * *
The Fortran 2003/2009 status should be updated based on:
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Fortran2003
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Fortran2003Status
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Fortran2008Status
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortran#news
Release notes, e.g.,
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.4/changes.html
cf. http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gfortran/Fortran-2003-and-2008-status.html
--
Summary: gfortran documentation: Add note to C prog. part +
update F200x status
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: documentation
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40377
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/40377] gfortran documentation: Add note to C prog. part + update F200x status
2009-06-08 7:03 [Bug fortran/40377] New: gfortran documentation: Add note to C prog. part + update F200x status burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-06-08 19:03 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-06-13 19:21 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-06-08 19:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-08 19:02 -------
As this is my texi cleanup bug: Dump the following in order to not forget it.
Index: intrinsic.texi
===================================================================
--- intrinsic.texi (Revision 148274)
+++ intrinsic.texi
@@ -11241,6 +11241,11 @@
Identifies the preconnected unit identified by the asterisk
(@code{*}) in @code{READ} statement.
+@item @code{INT8}, @code{INT16}, @code{INT32}, @code{INT64}
+Kind type parameters to specify an INTEGER type with a storage
+size of 16, 32, and 64 bits. It is negative if a target platform
+does not support the particular kind.
+
@item @code{IOSTAT_END}:
The value assigned to the variable passed to the IOSTAT= specifier of
an input/output statement if an end-of-file condition occurred.
@@ -11255,8 +11260,15 @@
@item @code{OUTPUT_UNIT}:
Identifies the preconnected unit identified by the asterisk
(@code{*}) in @code{WRITE} statement.
+
+@item @code{REAL32}, @code{REAL64}, @code{REAL128}
+Kind type parameters to specify an INTEGER type with a storage
+size of 32, 64, and 128 bits. It is negative if a target platform
+does not support the particular kind.
@end table
+
+
@node ISO_C_BINDING
@section @code{ISO_C_BINDING}
@table @asis
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40377
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/40377] gfortran documentation: Add note to C prog. part + update F200x status
2009-06-08 7:03 [Bug fortran/40377] New: gfortran documentation: Add note to C prog. part + update F200x status burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-06-08 19:03 ` [Bug fortran/40377] " burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-06-13 19:21 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-12-07 15:35 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-06-13 19:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-13 19:21 -------
Isn't this known by Fortran/C developers already? Does this belong in manual
really because this is standard Fortran/C issues?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40377
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/40377] gfortran documentation: Add note to C prog. part + update F200x status
2009-06-08 7:03 [Bug fortran/40377] New: gfortran documentation: Add note to C prog. part + update F200x status burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-06-08 19:03 ` [Bug fortran/40377] " burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-06-13 19:21 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-12-07 15:35 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-12-08 8:52 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-12-08 8:53 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-12-07 15:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-07 15:35 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> As this is my texi cleanup bug: Dump the following in order to not forget it.
Seemingly, I applied it at some point. Thus, only comment 0 remains.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40377
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/40377] gfortran documentation: Add note to C prog. part + update F200x status
2009-06-08 7:03 [Bug fortran/40377] New: gfortran documentation: Add note to C prog. part + update F200x status burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2009-12-07 15:35 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-12-08 8:52 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-12-08 8:53 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-12-08 8:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-08 08:52 -------
Subject: Bug 40377
Author: burnus
Date: Tue Dec 8 08:52:28 2009
New Revision: 155083
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155083
Log:
2009-12-08 Tobias Burnus <burnus@net-b.de>
PR fortran/40961
PR fortran/40377
* gfortran.texi (Non-Fortran Main Program): Add
_gfortran_set_fpe documentation.
(Interoperability with C): Mention array storage order.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/fortran/gfortran.texi
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40377
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/40377] gfortran documentation: Add note to C prog. part + update F200x status
2009-06-08 7:03 [Bug fortran/40377] New: gfortran documentation: Add note to C prog. part + update F200x status burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2009-12-08 8:52 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-12-08 8:53 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-12-08 8:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-08 08:53 -------
FIXED
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40377
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-12-08 8:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-06-08 7:03 [Bug fortran/40377] New: gfortran documentation: Add note to C prog. part + update F200x status burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-06-08 19:03 ` [Bug fortran/40377] " burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-06-13 19:21 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-12-07 15:35 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-12-08 8:52 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-12-08 8:53 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).