[Bug fortran/40377] New: gfortran documentation: Add note to C prog. part + update F200x status

[Bug fortran/40377] New: gfortran documentation: Add note to C prog. part + update F200x status

[burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org]

The GNU Fortran manual should mention in the mixed-language programming section
that
  C's  A[i][j]
matches
  Fortran's A(j,i)
and that A(j+1,i) follows A(j,i) in memory.

Cf. http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gfortran/Mixed_002dLanguage-Programming.html

 * * *

The Fortran 2003/2009 status should be updated based on:
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Fortran2003
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Fortran2003Status
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Fortran2008Status
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortran#news
Release notes, e.g.,
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.4/changes.html

cf. http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gfortran/Fortran-2003-and-2008-status.html


-- 
           Summary: gfortran documentation: Add note to C prog. part +
                    update F200x status
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.5.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: documentation
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: fortran
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40377

[Bug fortran/40377] gfortran documentation: Add note to C prog. part + update F200x status

[burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-06-08 19:02 -------
As this is my texi cleanup bug: Dump the following in order to not forget it.

Index: intrinsic.texi
===================================================================
--- intrinsic.texi      (Revision 148274)
+++ intrinsic.texi
@@ -11241,6 +11241,11 @@
 Identifies the preconnected unit identified by the asterisk
 (@code{*}) in @code{READ} statement.

+@item @code{INT8}, @code{INT16}, @code{INT32}, @code{INT64}
+Kind type parameters to specify an INTEGER type with a storage
+size of 16, 32, and 64 bits. It is negative if a target platform
+does not support the particular kind.
+
 @item @code{IOSTAT_END}:
 The value assigned to the variable passed to the IOSTAT= specifier of
 an input/output statement if an end-of-file condition occurred.
@@ -11255,8 +11260,15 @@
 @item @code{OUTPUT_UNIT}:
 Identifies the preconnected unit identified by the asterisk
 (@code{*}) in @code{WRITE} statement.
+
+@item @code{REAL32}, @code{REAL64}, @code{REAL128}
+Kind type parameters to specify an INTEGER type with a storage
+size of 32, 64, and 128 bits. It is negative if a target platform
+does not support the particular kind.
 @end table

+
+
 @node ISO_C_BINDING
 @section @code{ISO_C_BINDING}
 @table @asis


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40377

[Bug fortran/40377] gfortran documentation: Add note to C prog. part + update F200x status

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-06-13 19:21 -------
Isn't this known by Fortran/C developers already?  Does this belong in manual
really because this is standard Fortran/C issues?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40377

[Bug fortran/40377] gfortran documentation: Add note to C prog. part + update F200x status

[burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-12-07 15:35 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> As this is my texi cleanup bug: Dump the following in order to not forget it.
Seemingly, I applied it at some point. Thus, only comment 0 remains.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40377

[Bug fortran/40377] gfortran documentation: Add note to C prog. part + update F200x status

[burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-12-08 08:52 -------
Subject: Bug 40377

Author: burnus
Date: Tue Dec  8 08:52:28 2009
New Revision: 155083

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155083
Log:
2009-12-08  Tobias Burnus  <burnus@net-b.de>

        PR fortran/40961
        PR fortran/40377
        * gfortran.texi (Non-Fortran Main Program): Add
        _gfortran_set_fpe documentation.
        (Interoperability with C): Mention array storage order.


Modified:
    trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/fortran/gfortran.texi


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40377

[Bug fortran/40377] gfortran documentation: Add note to C prog. part + update F200x status

[burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-12-08 08:53 -------
FIXED


-- 

burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40377