From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 864 invoked by alias); 8 Dec 2009 16:01:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 31402 invoked by uid 48); 8 Dec 2009 16:01:37 -0000 Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 16:01:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20091208160137.31400.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug middle-end/42110] [4.5 Regression] ICE with inlining In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-12/txt/msg00849.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-08 16:01 ------- I assumed it is special vtable handling (that likely doesn't cause the addressable flag to be set?) - I simply stopped debugging at the point where I noticed the node gets removed even though there are still indirect calls that possibly can reach it. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42110