From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9987 invoked by alias); 8 Dec 2009 19:30:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 9888 invoked by uid 48); 8 Dec 2009 19:30:06 -0000 Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 19:30:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20091208193006.9885.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug other/42333] complex division failure on darwin10 with -lm In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-12/txt/msg00863.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #4 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-12-08 19:30 ------- Dominique, It would be interesting to know what happens with a build of gcc trunk under darwin10 if you regress out the r154282 and r154283 that introduced the libgcc_ext feature . I suspect this regression may have occurred at this point. I wasn't building with mpc before the libgcc_ext patch was committed. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42333