public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/40011] Problems with -fwhole-file
Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2009 11:51:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091209115058.18687.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-40011-12313@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
------- Comment #51 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2009-12-09 11:50 -------
still failing with current trunk, also leading to miscomples (see PR38913). As
a consequence, should one disable -fwhole-file (and consequently -flto) for
Fortran before release?
--
jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed|2009-05-04 09:10:10 |2009-12-09 11:50:57
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40011
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-09 11:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-03 19:53 [Bug fortran/40011] New: " dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-05-04 9:10 ` [Bug fortran/40011] " pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-05-04 9:29 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-05-04 9:31 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-05-04 17:55 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-05-04 21:52 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-05-04 22:20 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-05-04 22:44 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-05-05 4:18 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
2009-05-05 7:05 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-05-05 7:06 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-05-05 11:33 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-05-05 15:57 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-05-05 18:12 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-05-05 19:29 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
2009-05-07 18:00 ` dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-05-07 18:34 ` dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-05-08 14:09 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-05-17 5:12 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
2009-05-22 13:40 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-05-25 6:13 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
2009-05-27 13:03 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-05-27 14:05 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-05-27 17:52 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
2009-05-29 15:34 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-05-29 16:34 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
2009-05-29 18:42 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-05-30 8:27 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-06-01 18:01 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-06-01 19:34 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
2009-06-01 19:43 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
2009-06-02 9:29 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-06-02 12:32 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-06-14 16:58 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-07-24 5:39 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
2009-07-24 5:48 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
2009-07-24 10:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-07-24 10:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-07-24 10:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-07-24 11:29 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
2009-07-25 16:53 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
2009-07-26 21:23 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-07-28 7:37 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
2009-08-01 13:45 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-03 10:12 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
2009-08-26 9:24 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
2009-08-26 9:35 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2009-08-26 10:32 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-08-26 10:34 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-08-26 10:36 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-10-11 12:46 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
2009-12-09 11:51 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk [this message]
2009-12-09 11:52 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2010-05-03 10:57 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
2010-05-03 19:24 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-26 5:11 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-26 13:13 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
2010-05-26 14:53 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-07-18 20:50 ` dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-23 22:16 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
2010-07-23 22:55 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
2010-07-24 8:24 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
2010-07-24 11:11 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
2010-07-24 11:14 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
2010-07-24 11:31 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-24 13:08 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-24 13:46 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2010-07-24 14:08 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-24 16:32 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-25 1:21 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-25 10:11 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-26 9:53 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-26 13:15 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
[not found] <bug-40011-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2020-06-14 15:24 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091209115058.18687.qmail@sourceware.org \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).