From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27735 invoked by alias); 18 Dec 2009 14:45:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 27678 invoked by uid 48); 18 Dec 2009 14:45:13 -0000 Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 14:45:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20091218144513.27677.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/40168] missing unrolling/scalarization/reassoc/free In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-12/txt/msg01853.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #20 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-18 14:45 ------- There is still the issue about the 2nd testcase. It needs to be re-analyzed and possibly simplified. But it's now a pure optimization issue, not a frontend issue anymore. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Component|fortran |tree-optimization Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2009-12-18 14:45:13 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40168