From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17379 invoked by alias); 22 Dec 2009 13:49:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 17341 invoked by alias); 22 Dec 2009 13:49:44 -0000 Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 13:49:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20091222134944.17340.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug translation/42458] 33 typos in gcc-4.5-b20091203.pot file In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "karvonen dot jorma at gmail dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-12/txt/msg02105.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #2 from karvonen dot jorma at gmail dot com 2009-12-22 13:49 ------- Subject: Re: 33 typos in gcc-4.5-b20091203.pot file OK, thank you, I was thinking that that %' was wrong. It tried to find information about %' or gcc-internal-format with google, but missed. So these all 33 typos are not typos. My mistake. Sorry. PLS, mark this bug fixed. Jorma K. 2009/12/22 joseph at codesourcery dot com : > > > ------- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com  2009-12-22 12:15 ------- > Subject: Re:   New: 33 typos in gcc-4.5-b20091203.pot >  file > > On Tue, 22 Dec 2009, karvonen dot jorma at gmail dot com wrote: > >> I have picked the following lines from file gcc-4.5-b20091203.pot: > > This is not a useful bug report.  You have extracted some lines, but > without any explanation of why you think something is wrong with most of > them.  If you think different things are wrong with different messages, > each such problem should have its own issue filed as messages in different > parts of the compiler are maintained by different people.  So file > separate issues for each distinct problem in a distinct part of the > compiler, making clear exactly why you think something is wrong.  If you > think there is a typo, indicate what word you think is wrong and what you > think it should be instead. > >> #: c-common.c:7053 c-common.c:7145 >> #, gcc-internal-format >> msgid "can%'t set %qE attribute after definition" >> >> #: c-decl.c:1533 >> #, gcc-internal-format >> msgid "a parameter list with an ellipsis can%'t match an empty parameter name >> list declaration" >> >> Is this above really gcc-internal-format ? There are more like this below, but >> I do not mark them any more. > > What makes you think gcc-internal-format is wrong here?  Both %' and %qE > are GCC-specific formats (the former indicating that English messages > should use an apostrophe if LC_CTYPE supports it - so it should not be > used in translations, only in English messages - and the latter indicating > that the format argument is an identifier and the output is quoted - so > %qE should appear in the translations). > > > -- > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42458 > > -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42458