[Bug translation/42458] New: 33 typos in gcc-4.5-b20091203.pot file

[Bug translation/42458] New: 33 typos in gcc-4.5-b20091203.pot file

[karvonen dot jorma at gmail dot com]

I have picked the following lines from file gcc-4.5-b20091203.pot:

#: c-common.c:7053 c-common.c:7145
#, gcc-internal-format
msgid "can%'t set %qE attribute after definition"

#: c-decl.c:1533
#, gcc-internal-format
msgid "a parameter list with an ellipsis can%'t match an empty parameter name
list declaration"

Is this above really gcc-internal-format ? There are more like this below, but
I do not mark them any more.

#: c-decl.c:1540
#, gcc-internal-format
msgid "an argument type that has a default promotion can%'t match an empty
parameter name list declaration"

#: c-decl.c:4215 varasm.c:2139
#, gcc-internal-format
msgid "storage size of %q+D isn%'t known"

#: c-decl.c:4226
#, gcc-internal-format
msgid "storage size of %q+D isn%'t constant"

#: c-decl.c:4647
#, gcc-internal-format
msgid "ISO C90 forbids array %qE whose size can%'t be evaluated"

#: c-decl.c:4651
#, gcc-internal-format
msgid "ISO C90 forbids array whose size can%'t be evaluated"

#: c-decl.c:4670
#, gcc-internal-format
msgid "the size of array %qE can%'t be evaluated"

#: c-decl.c:4674
#, gcc-internal-format
msgid "the size of array can %'t be evaluated"

#: c-decl.c:6051 c-decl.c:7467
#, gcc-internal-format
msgid "function declaration isn%'t a prototype"

#: c-decl.c:6561
#, gcc-internal-format
msgid "ISO C doesn%'t support unnamed structs/unions"

#: c-decl.c:7778
#, gcc-internal-format
msgid "number of arguments doesn%'t match built-in prototype"

#: c-decl.c:7789
#, gcc-internal-format
msgid "number of arguments doesn%'t match prototype"

#: c-decl.c:7826
#, gcc-internal-format
msgid "promoted argument %qD doesn%'t match built-in prototype"

#: c-decl.c:7831
#, gcc-internal-format
msgid "promoted argument %qD doesn%'t match prototype"

#: c-decl.c:7841
#, gcc-internal-format
msgid "argument %qD doesn%'t match built-in prototype"

#: c-decl.c:7846
#, gcc-internal-format
msgid "argument %qD doesn%'t match prototype"

#: c-pch.c:132
#, gcc-internal-format
msgid "can%'t create precompiled header %s: %m"

#: c-pch.c:153
#, gcc-internal-format
msgid "can%'t write to %s: %m"

PLS, can you write this above more explicitly: "cannot write to file %s: %m" or
something like that

#: c-pch.c:188 c-pch.c:203 c-pch.c:217
#, gcc-internal-format
msgid "can%'t write %s: %m"

More explicitly here too. Write what? A file, a string, a field? Translators
would appreciate if it were more explicitly. 

#: c-pch.c:193 c-pch.c:210
#, gcc-internal-format
msgid "can%'t seek in %s: %m"

More explicitly, PLS.

#: c-pch.c:201 c-pch.c:243 c-pch.c:284 c-pch.c:335
#, gcc-internal-format
msgid "can%'t read %s: %m"

More explicitly, PLS.

#: c-pch.c:473
#, gcc-internal-format
msgid "%s: couldn%'t open PCH file: %m"

#: c-typeck.c:739
#, gcc-internal-format
msgid "can%'t mix operands of decimal float and vector types"

#: c-typeck.c:744
#, gcc-internal-format
msgid "can%'t mix operands of decimal float and complex types"

#: c-typeck.c:744
#, gcc-internal-format
msgid "can%'t mix operands of decimal float and complex types"

#: c-typeck.c:749
#, gcc-internal-format
msgid "can%'t mix operands of decimal float and other float types"

#: stmt.c:900
#, gcc-internal-format
msgid "asm operand %d probably doesn%'t match constraints"

#: stor-layout.c:160
#, gcc-internal-format
msgid "type size can%'t be explicitly evaluated"

#: toplev.c:2051
#, gcc-internal-format
msgid "can%'t open %s: %m"

More explicitly, PLS.

#: tree-cfg.c:3937
#, gcc-internal-format
msgid "statement marked for throw, but doesn%'t"

#: varasm.c:1375
#, gcc-internal-format
msgid "data type of %q+D isn%'t suitable for a register"

#: varasm.c:1378
#, gcc-internal-format
msgid "register specified for %q+D isn%'t suitable for data type"


-- 
           Summary: 33 typos in gcc-4.5-b20091203.pot file
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.5.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: minor
          Priority: P3
         Component: translation
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: karvonen dot jorma at gmail dot com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42458

[Bug translation/42458] 33 typos in gcc-4.5-b20091203.pot file

[joseph at codesourcery dot com]

------- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com  2009-12-22 12:15 -------
Subject: Re:   New: 33 typos in gcc-4.5-b20091203.pot
 file

On Tue, 22 Dec 2009, karvonen dot jorma at gmail dot com wrote:

> I have picked the following lines from file gcc-4.5-b20091203.pot:

This is not a useful bug report.  You have extracted some lines, but 
without any explanation of why you think something is wrong with most of 
them.  If you think different things are wrong with different messages, 
each such problem should have its own issue filed as messages in different 
parts of the compiler are maintained by different people.  So file 
separate issues for each distinct problem in a distinct part of the 
compiler, making clear exactly why you think something is wrong.  If you 
think there is a typo, indicate what word you think is wrong and what you 
think it should be instead.

> #: c-common.c:7053 c-common.c:7145
> #, gcc-internal-format
> msgid "can%'t set %qE attribute after definition"
> 
> #: c-decl.c:1533
> #, gcc-internal-format
> msgid "a parameter list with an ellipsis can%'t match an empty parameter name
> list declaration"
> 
> Is this above really gcc-internal-format ? There are more like this below, but
> I do not mark them any more.

What makes you think gcc-internal-format is wrong here?  Both %' and %qE 
are GCC-specific formats (the former indicating that English messages 
should use an apostrophe if LC_CTYPE supports it - so it should not be 
used in translations, only in English messages - and the latter indicating 
that the format argument is an identifier and the output is quoted - so 
%qE should appear in the translations).


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42458

Re: [Bug translation/42458] 33 typos in gcc-4.5-b20091203.pot file

[Jorma Karvonen]

OK,

thank you, I was thinking that that %' was wrong. It tried to find
information about %' or gcc-internal-format with google, but missed.
So these all 33 typos are not typos. My mistake. Sorry. PLS, mark this
bug fixed.

Jorma K.

2009/12/22 joseph at codesourcery dot com <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>:
>
>
> ------- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com  2009-12-22 12:15 -------
> Subject: Re:   New: 33 typos in gcc-4.5-b20091203.pot
>  file
>
> On Tue, 22 Dec 2009, karvonen dot jorma at gmail dot com wrote:
>
>> I have picked the following lines from file gcc-4.5-b20091203.pot:
>
> This is not a useful bug report.  You have extracted some lines, but
> without any explanation of why you think something is wrong with most of
> them.  If you think different things are wrong with different messages,
> each such problem should have its own issue filed as messages in different
> parts of the compiler are maintained by different people.  So file
> separate issues for each distinct problem in a distinct part of the
> compiler, making clear exactly why you think something is wrong.  If you
> think there is a typo, indicate what word you think is wrong and what you
> think it should be instead.
>
>> #: c-common.c:7053 c-common.c:7145
>> #, gcc-internal-format
>> msgid "can%'t set %qE attribute after definition"
>>
>> #: c-decl.c:1533
>> #, gcc-internal-format
>> msgid "a parameter list with an ellipsis can%'t match an empty parameter name
>> list declaration"
>>
>> Is this above really gcc-internal-format ? There are more like this below, but
>> I do not mark them any more.
>
> What makes you think gcc-internal-format is wrong here?  Both %' and %qE
> are GCC-specific formats (the former indicating that English messages
> should use an apostrophe if LC_CTYPE supports it - so it should not be
> used in translations, only in English messages - and the latter indicating
> that the format argument is an identifier and the output is quoted - so
> %qE should appear in the translations).
>
>
> --
>
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42458
>
>

[Bug translation/42458] 33 typos in gcc-4.5-b20091203.pot file

[karvonen dot jorma at gmail dot com]

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2294 bytes --]



------- Comment #2 from karvonen dot jorma at gmail dot com  2009-12-22 13:49 -------
Subject: Re:  33 typos in gcc-4.5-b20091203.pot file

OK,

thank you, I was thinking that that %' was wrong. It tried to find
information about %' or gcc-internal-format with google, but missed.
So these all 33 typos are not typos. My mistake. Sorry. PLS, mark this
bug fixed.

Jorma K.

2009/12/22 joseph at codesourcery dot com <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>:
>
>
> ------- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com  2009-12-22 12:15 -------
> Subject: Re:   New: 33 typos in gcc-4.5-b20091203.pot
>  file
>
> On Tue, 22 Dec 2009, karvonen dot jorma at gmail dot com wrote:
>
>> I have picked the following lines from file gcc-4.5-b20091203.pot:
>
> This is not a useful bug report.  You have extracted some lines, but
> without any explanation of why you think something is wrong with most of
> them.  If you think different things are wrong with different messages,
> each such problem should have its own issue filed as messages in different
> parts of the compiler are maintained by different people.  So file
> separate issues for each distinct problem in a distinct part of the
> compiler, making clear exactly why you think something is wrong.  If you
> think there is a typo, indicate what word you think is wrong and what you
> think it should be instead.
>
>> #: c-common.c:7053 c-common.c:7145
>> #, gcc-internal-format
>> msgid "can%'t set %qE attribute after definition"
>>
>> #: c-decl.c:1533
>> #, gcc-internal-format
>> msgid "a parameter list with an ellipsis can%'t match an empty parameter name
>> list declaration"
>>
>> Is this above really gcc-internal-format ? There are more like this below, but
>> I do not mark them any more.
>
> What makes you think gcc-internal-format is wrong here?  Both %' and %qE
> are GCC-specific formats (the former indicating that English messages
> should use an apostrophe if LC_CTYPE supports it - so it should not be
> used in translations, only in English messages - and the latter indicating
> that the format argument is an identifier and the output is quoted - so
> %qE should appear in the translations).
>
>
> --
>
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42458
>
>


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42458

[Bug translation/42458] 33 typos in gcc-4.5-b20091203.pot file

[paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com]

------- Comment #3 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com  2009-12-22 14:07 -------
Fine.


-- 

paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42458