From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-303038-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 23991 invoked by alias); 23 Dec 2009 22:39:41 -0000
Received: (qmail 23976 invoked by uid 48); 23 Dec 2009 22:39:32 -0000
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 22:39:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20091223223932.23975.qmail@sourceware.org>
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
References: <bug-42481-11265@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Subject: [Bug fortran/42481] generic interface not recognized
In-Reply-To: <bug-42481-11265@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
From: "anlauf at gmx dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-12/txt/msg02283.txt.bz2



------- Comment #2 from anlauf at gmx dot de  2009-12-23 22:39 -------
Note that I personally would declare sub as generic in mod1, e.g.

module mod1
  interface sub
     module procedure sub
  end interface
contains
  subroutine sub(x)
    real x
  end subroutine sub
end module mod1

and remove the corresponding module procedure in mod2, as this resolves
the compilation errors with gfortran and nagfor.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42481