public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug rtl-optimization/42489] New: Function call never happened after compile with -foptimize-sibling-calls
@ 2009-12-24 11:43 t66667 at gmail dot com
2009-12-24 11:44 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/42489] " t66667 at gmail dot com
` (11 more replies)
0 siblings, 12 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: t66667 at gmail dot com @ 2009-12-24 11:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
In function __xmlRaiseError of error.c ( libxml2.a ) if this particular c file
is compiled with optimization -O2 ( -foptimize-sibling-calls ) call to this
function from xmlFatalErrMsgStrIntStr() parser.c ( libxml2.a ) will never take
place, and, seems to cause dead-lock situation.
Tested recompile this c file with, -fno-optimize-sibling-calls, confirm to
workaround the bug.
--
Summary: Function call never happened after compile with -
foptimize-sibling-calls
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: t66667 at gmail dot com
GCC build triplet: x86_64-slackware-linux
GCC host triplet: x86_64-slackware-linux
GCC target triplet: x86_64-w64-mingw32
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42489
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* [Bug rtl-optimization/42489] Function call never happened after compile with -foptimize-sibling-calls 2009-12-24 11:43 [Bug rtl-optimization/42489] New: Function call never happened after compile with -foptimize-sibling-calls t66667 at gmail dot com @ 2009-12-24 11:44 ` t66667 at gmail dot com 2009-12-24 11:57 ` t66667 at gmail dot com ` (10 subsequent siblings) 11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: t66667 at gmail dot com @ 2009-12-24 11:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #1 from t66667 at gmail dot com 2009-12-24 11:44 ------- Created an attachment (id=19386) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19386&action=view) saves .ok compiled with -fno-optimize-sibling-calls -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42489 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/42489] Function call never happened after compile with -foptimize-sibling-calls 2009-12-24 11:43 [Bug rtl-optimization/42489] New: Function call never happened after compile with -foptimize-sibling-calls t66667 at gmail dot com 2009-12-24 11:44 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/42489] " t66667 at gmail dot com @ 2009-12-24 11:57 ` t66667 at gmail dot com 2009-12-24 21:25 ` d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com ` (9 subsequent siblings) 11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: t66667 at gmail dot com @ 2009-12-24 11:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #2 from t66667 at gmail dot com 2009-12-24 11:57 ------- (gdb) disass $pc-30 $pc+30 Dump of assembler code from 0x4933e3 to 0x49341f: 0x004933e3 <__xmlRaiseError+179>: add %al,(%eax) 0x004933e5 <__xmlRaiseError+181>: add %al,%bh 0x004933e7 <__xmlRaiseError+183>: add $0x24,%al 0x004933e9 <__xmlRaiseError+185>: xchg %eax,%esi 0x004933ea <__xmlRaiseError+186>: add %al,(%eax) 0x004933ec <__xmlRaiseError+188>: add %cl,0x15ff0076(%ebp) 0x004933f2 <__xmlRaiseError+194>: movsb %ds:(%esi),%es:(%edi) 0x004933f3 <__xmlRaiseError+195>: inc %ecx 0x004933f4 <__xmlRaiseError+196>: dec %esp 0x004933f5 <__xmlRaiseError+197>: add %al,-0x1fba7640(%ebp) 0x004933fb <__xmlRaiseError+203>: je 0x4934d0 <__xmlRaiseError+416> 0x00493401 <__xmlRaiseError+209>: jmp 0x493401 <__xmlRaiseError+209> 0x00493403 <__xmlRaiseError+211>: cmpl $0x0,0xc(%ebp) 0x00493407 <__xmlRaiseError+215>: je 0x49346f <__xmlRaiseError+319> 0x00493409 <__xmlRaiseError+217>: cmpl $0x493220,0xc(%ebp) 0x00493410 <__xmlRaiseError+224>: je 0x49366c <__xmlRaiseError+828> 0x00493416 <__xmlRaiseError+230>: cmpl $0x493130,0xc(%ebp) 0x0049341d <__xmlRaiseError+237>: je 0x49366c <__xmlRaiseError+828> End of assembler dump. (gdb) info all-registers eax 0xa07308 10515208 ecx 0x77633b23 2002991907 edx 0xa07303 10515203 ebx 0x4f97c4 5216196 esp 0x28ec10 0x28ec10 ebp 0x28ec48 0x28ec48 esi 0xa02ac0 10496704 edi 0x1 1 eip 0x493401 0x493401 <__xmlRaiseError+209> eflags 0x202 [ IF ] cs 0x23 35 ss 0x2b 43 ds 0x2b 43 es 0x2b 43 fs 0x53 83 gs 0x2b 43 st0 0 (raw 0x00000000000000000000) st1 0 (raw 0x00000000000000000000) st2 0 (raw 0x00000000000000000000) st3 0 (raw 0x00000000000000000000) st4 0 (raw 0x00000000000000000000) st5 0 (raw 0x00000000000000000000) st6 0 (raw 0x00000000000000000000) st7 -0 (raw 0x80000000000000000000) fctrl 0x37f 895 fstat 0x4000 16384 ftag 0xffff 65535 fiseg 0xf800 63488 fioff 0x288ce52 42520146 foseg 0xfa80 64128 fooff 0x759c060 123322464 fop 0x0 0 xmm0 {v4_float = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, v2_double = {0x0, 0x0}, v16_int8 = {0x0 <repeats 16 times>}, v8_int16 = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, v4_int32 = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, v2_int64 = {0x0, 0x0}, uint128 = 0x00000000000000000000000000000000} xmm1 {v4_float = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, v2_double = {0x0, 0x0}, v16_int8 = {0x0 <repeats 16 times>}, v8_int16 = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, v4_int32 = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, v2_int64 = {0x0, 0x0}, uint128 = 0x00000000000000000000000000000000} xmm2 {v4_float = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, v2_double = {0x0, 0x0}, v16_int8 = {0x0 <repeats 16 times>}, v8_int16 = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, v4_int32 = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, v2_int64 = {0x0, 0x0}, uint128 = 0x00000000000000000000000000000000} xmm3 {v4_float = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, v2_double = {0x0, 0x0}, v16_int8 = {0x0 <repeats 16 times>}, v8_int16 = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, v4_int32 = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, v2_int64 = {0x0, 0x0}, uint128 = 0x00000000000000000000000000000000} xmm4 {v4_float = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, v2_double = {0x0, 0x0}, v16_int8 = {0x0 <repeats 16 times>}, v8_int16 = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, v4_int32 = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, v2_int64 = {0x0, 0x0}, uint128 = 0x00000000000000000000000000000000} xmm5 {v4_float = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, v2_double = {0x0, 0x0}, v16_int8 = {0x0 <repeats 16 times>}, v8_int16 = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, v4_int32 = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, v2_int64 = {0x0, 0x0}, uint128 = 0x00000000000000000000000000000000} xmm6 {v4_float = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, v2_double = {0x0, 0x0}, v16_int8 = {0x0 <repeats 16 times>}, v8_int16 = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, v4_int32 = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, v2_int64 = {0x0, 0x0}, uint128 = 0x00000000000000000000000000000000} xmm7 {v4_float = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, v2_double = {0x0, 0x0}, v16_int8 = {0x0 <repeats 16 times>}, v8_int16 = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, v4_int32 = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, v2_int64 = {0x0, 0x0}, uint128 = 0x00000000000000000000000000000000} mxcsr 0x1f80 [ IM DM ZM OM UM PM ] mm0 {uint64 = 0x0, v2_int32 = {0x0, 0x0}, v4_int16 = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, v8_int8 = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}} mm1 {uint64 = 0x0, v2_int32 = {0x0, 0x0}, v4_int16 = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, v8_int8 = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}} mm2 {uint64 = 0x0, v2_int32 = {0x0, 0x0}, v4_int16 = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, v8_int8 = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}} mm3 {uint64 = 0x0, v2_int32 = {0x0, 0x0}, v4_int16 = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, v8_int8 = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}} mm4 {uint64 = 0x0, v2_int32 = {0x0, 0x0}, v4_int16 = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, v8_int8 = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}} mm5 {uint64 = 0x0, v2_int32 = {0x0, 0x0}, v4_int16 = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, v8_int8 = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}} mm6 {uint64 = 0x0, v2_int32 = {0x0, 0x0}, v4_int16 = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, v8_int8 = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}} mm7 {uint64 = 0x0, v2_int32 = {0x0, 0x0}, v4_int16 = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, v8_int8 = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}} (gdb) bt #0 0x00493401 in __xmlRaiseError () #1 0x0044ac53 in xmlFatalErrMsgStrIntStr () #2 0x00452529 in xmlParseEndTag2 () #3 0x00458d7a in xmlParseElement () #4 0x004590da in xmlParseContent () #5 0x00458c94 in xmlParseElement () #6 0x0045f532 in xmlParseDocument () #7 0x0045f7f3 in xmlDoRead () #8 0x00404624 in parseAndPrintFile () #9 0x0040715d in main () (gdb) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42489 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/42489] Function call never happened after compile with -foptimize-sibling-calls 2009-12-24 11:43 [Bug rtl-optimization/42489] New: Function call never happened after compile with -foptimize-sibling-calls t66667 at gmail dot com 2009-12-24 11:44 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/42489] " t66667 at gmail dot com 2009-12-24 11:57 ` t66667 at gmail dot com @ 2009-12-24 21:25 ` d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2009-12-24 21:30 ` t66667 at gmail dot com ` (8 subsequent siblings) 11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com @ 2009-12-24 21:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #3 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2009-12-24 21:25 ------- Some issues with -foptimize-sibling-calls were fixed in GCC 4.5 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42489 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/42489] Function call never happened after compile with -foptimize-sibling-calls 2009-12-24 11:43 [Bug rtl-optimization/42489] New: Function call never happened after compile with -foptimize-sibling-calls t66667 at gmail dot com ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2009-12-24 21:25 ` d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com @ 2009-12-24 21:30 ` t66667 at gmail dot com 2009-12-24 22:09 ` t66667 at gmail dot com ` (7 subsequent siblings) 11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: t66667 at gmail dot com @ 2009-12-24 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #4 from t66667 at gmail dot com 2009-12-24 21:29 ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Some issues with -foptimize-sibling-calls were fixed in GCC 4.5 > Backport it to 4.4 branch? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42489 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/42489] Function call never happened after compile with -foptimize-sibling-calls 2009-12-24 11:43 [Bug rtl-optimization/42489] New: Function call never happened after compile with -foptimize-sibling-calls t66667 at gmail dot com ` (3 preceding siblings ...) 2009-12-24 21:30 ` t66667 at gmail dot com @ 2009-12-24 22:09 ` t66667 at gmail dot com 2009-12-24 22:45 ` t66667 at gmail dot com ` (6 subsequent siblings) 11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: t66667 at gmail dot com @ 2009-12-24 22:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #5 from t66667 at gmail dot com 2009-12-24 22:09 ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Some issues with -foptimize-sibling-calls were fixed in GCC 4.5 > Which revision fix in trunk?? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42489 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/42489] Function call never happened after compile with -foptimize-sibling-calls 2009-12-24 11:43 [Bug rtl-optimization/42489] New: Function call never happened after compile with -foptimize-sibling-calls t66667 at gmail dot com ` (4 preceding siblings ...) 2009-12-24 22:09 ` t66667 at gmail dot com @ 2009-12-24 22:45 ` t66667 at gmail dot com 2009-12-25 1:19 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com ` (5 subsequent siblings) 11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: t66667 at gmail dot com @ 2009-12-24 22:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #6 from t66667 at gmail dot com 2009-12-24 22:44 ------- Cause endless maximum cpu usage in application run-time. -- t66667 at gmail dot com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |major http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42489 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/42489] Function call never happened after compile with -foptimize-sibling-calls 2009-12-24 11:43 [Bug rtl-optimization/42489] New: Function call never happened after compile with -foptimize-sibling-calls t66667 at gmail dot com ` (5 preceding siblings ...) 2009-12-24 22:45 ` t66667 at gmail dot com @ 2009-12-25 1:19 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-12-25 2:46 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/42489] Opt bug -foptimize-sibling-calls function call stalled! dead-lock, cpu max t66667 at gmail dot com ` (4 subsequent siblings) 11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com @ 2009-12-25 1:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs -- paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|major |normal http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42489 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/42489] Opt bug -foptimize-sibling-calls function call stalled! dead-lock, cpu max 2009-12-24 11:43 [Bug rtl-optimization/42489] New: Function call never happened after compile with -foptimize-sibling-calls t66667 at gmail dot com ` (6 preceding siblings ...) 2009-12-25 1:19 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com @ 2009-12-25 2:46 ` t66667 at gmail dot com 2009-12-25 2:52 ` t66667 at gmail dot com ` (3 subsequent siblings) 11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: t66667 at gmail dot com @ 2009-12-25 2:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #7 from t66667 at gmail dot com 2009-12-25 02:46 ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Some issues with -foptimize-sibling-calls were fixed in GCC 4.5 > False. Browsed all recently committed gcc svn change-logs saw no -foptimize-sibling-calls related fixes. Updated gcc-trunk svn, compiled gcc-trunk. Tested gcc version 4.5.0 20091224 (experimental) Revision 155461 MINGW64-1684 Referential numerous bug-reports: * http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41424 * http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/forums/forum/723797/topic/3482477 Very mingw-w64 specific I think. -- t66667 at gmail dot com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Known to fail| |4.4.3 4.5.0 Summary|Function call never happened|Opt bug -foptimize-sibling- |after compile with - |calls function call stalled! |foptimize-sibling-calls |dead-lock, cpu max Version|4.4.3 |4.5.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42489 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/42489] Opt bug -foptimize-sibling-calls function call stalled! dead-lock, cpu max 2009-12-24 11:43 [Bug rtl-optimization/42489] New: Function call never happened after compile with -foptimize-sibling-calls t66667 at gmail dot com ` (7 preceding siblings ...) 2009-12-25 2:46 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/42489] Opt bug -foptimize-sibling-calls function call stalled! dead-lock, cpu max t66667 at gmail dot com @ 2009-12-25 2:52 ` t66667 at gmail dot com 2009-12-25 9:19 ` t66667 at gmail dot com ` (2 subsequent siblings) 11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: t66667 at gmail dot com @ 2009-12-25 2:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #8 from t66667 at gmail dot com 2009-12-25 02:51 ------- No simple test-case code can be provided you have to read libxml2 source error.c about less then 1000 lines. Without running program in the gdb, fprintf to stderr in the beginning of the __xmlRaiseError() there was no output, ran in gdb there was output and dead-lock cpu running 100% & it contributes to global warming. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42489 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/42489] Opt bug -foptimize-sibling-calls function call stalled! dead-lock, cpu max 2009-12-24 11:43 [Bug rtl-optimization/42489] New: Function call never happened after compile with -foptimize-sibling-calls t66667 at gmail dot com ` (8 preceding siblings ...) 2009-12-25 2:52 ` t66667 at gmail dot com @ 2009-12-25 9:19 ` t66667 at gmail dot com 2009-12-25 13:34 ` d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2010-01-05 11:14 ` t66667 at gmail dot com 11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: t66667 at gmail dot com @ 2009-12-25 9:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #9 from t66667 at gmail dot com 2009-12-25 09:18 ------- Most unfortunate the gcc-4.* built with crt and win32api from http://sf.net/projects/mingw do not suffer from this bug. Therefore specific to target i686/x86_64-w64-mingw32 http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64 only. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42489 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/42489] Opt bug -foptimize-sibling-calls function call stalled! dead-lock, cpu max 2009-12-24 11:43 [Bug rtl-optimization/42489] New: Function call never happened after compile with -foptimize-sibling-calls t66667 at gmail dot com ` (9 preceding siblings ...) 2009-12-25 9:19 ` t66667 at gmail dot com @ 2009-12-25 13:34 ` d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2010-01-05 11:14 ` t66667 at gmail dot com 11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com @ 2009-12-25 13:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #10 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2009-12-25 13:34 ------- > No simple test-case code can be provided you have to read > libxml2 source error.c about less then 1000 lines. Could you please provide the preprocessed source file, as described here: <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/> ? > Browsed all recently committed gcc svn change-logs saw no > -foptimize-sibling-calls related fixes. Which of course does not mean that there were no such fixes. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42489 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/42489] Opt bug -foptimize-sibling-calls function call stalled! dead-lock, cpu max 2009-12-24 11:43 [Bug rtl-optimization/42489] New: Function call never happened after compile with -foptimize-sibling-calls t66667 at gmail dot com ` (10 preceding siblings ...) 2009-12-25 13:34 ` d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com @ 2010-01-05 11:14 ` t66667 at gmail dot com 11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: t66667 at gmail dot com @ 2010-01-05 11:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #11 from t66667 at gmail dot com 2010-01-05 11:14 ------- nothing to do with gcc -- t66667 at gmail dot com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42489 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-01-05 11:14 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 13+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2009-12-24 11:43 [Bug rtl-optimization/42489] New: Function call never happened after compile with -foptimize-sibling-calls t66667 at gmail dot com 2009-12-24 11:44 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/42489] " t66667 at gmail dot com 2009-12-24 11:57 ` t66667 at gmail dot com 2009-12-24 21:25 ` d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2009-12-24 21:30 ` t66667 at gmail dot com 2009-12-24 22:09 ` t66667 at gmail dot com 2009-12-24 22:45 ` t66667 at gmail dot com 2009-12-25 1:19 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-12-25 2:46 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/42489] Opt bug -foptimize-sibling-calls function call stalled! dead-lock, cpu max t66667 at gmail dot com 2009-12-25 2:52 ` t66667 at gmail dot com 2009-12-25 9:19 ` t66667 at gmail dot com 2009-12-25 13:34 ` d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2010-01-05 11:14 ` t66667 at gmail dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).