public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/32053]  New: Anonymous union members' names should be distinct within enclosing scope
@ 2007-05-23  9:05 andrew dot stubbs at st dot com
  2007-10-31 16:15 ` [Bug c++/32053] " andrew dot stubbs at st dot com
  2009-12-26 14:32 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: andrew dot stubbs at st dot com @ 2007-05-23  9:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

The following program should not compile:

extern int foo;
static union
{
 int foo; // clash
};

C++ standard clause 9.5/2 states that members of anonymous unions must have
names distinct from other names in the same scope.

If the `extern' keyword is removed from the example above, the error is
diagnosed correctly (followed by an ICE).


-- 
           Summary: Anonymous union members' names should be distinct within
                    enclosing scope
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.1.1
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: andrew dot stubbs at st dot com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32053


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/32053] Anonymous union members' names should be distinct within enclosing scope
  2007-05-23  9:05 [Bug c++/32053] New: Anonymous union members' names should be distinct within enclosing scope andrew dot stubbs at st dot com
@ 2007-10-31 16:15 ` andrew dot stubbs at st dot com
  2009-12-26 14:32 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: andrew dot stubbs at st dot com @ 2007-10-31 16:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #1 from andrew dot stubbs at st dot com  2007-10-31 16:15 -------
This bug appears to be no longer present in GCC 4.2.1.


-- 

andrew dot stubbs at st dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Known to fail|                            |4.1.1
      Known to work|                            |3.4.3 4.2.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32053


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/32053] Anonymous union members' names should be distinct within enclosing scope
  2007-05-23  9:05 [Bug c++/32053] New: Anonymous union members' names should be distinct within enclosing scope andrew dot stubbs at st dot com
  2007-10-31 16:15 ` [Bug c++/32053] " andrew dot stubbs at st dot com
@ 2009-12-26 14:32 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com @ 2009-12-26 14:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #2 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com  2009-12-26 14:32 -------
Yes, fixed long time ago.


-- 

paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
      Known to work|3.4.3 4.2.1                 |3.4.3 4.2.1 4.4.0
         Resolution|                            |WORKSFORME


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32053


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-12-26 14:32 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-05-23  9:05 [Bug c++/32053] New: Anonymous union members' names should be distinct within enclosing scope andrew dot stubbs at st dot com
2007-10-31 16:15 ` [Bug c++/32053] " andrew dot stubbs at st dot com
2009-12-26 14:32 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).