* [Bug driver/42485] [4.4 regression] -V switch broken
2009-12-24 0:20 [Bug driver/42485] New: [4.4 regression] -V switch broken arthur dot loiret at gmail dot com
@ 2009-12-29 23:54 ` debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
2009-12-30 0:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org @ 2009-12-29 23:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org 2009-12-29 23:54 -------
wouldn't it be better to deprecate the -V switch altogether?
Matthias
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42485
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug driver/42485] [4.4 regression] -V switch broken
2009-12-24 0:20 [Bug driver/42485] New: [4.4 regression] -V switch broken arthur dot loiret at gmail dot com
2009-12-29 23:54 ` [Bug driver/42485] " debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
@ 2009-12-30 0:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-12-30 0:08 ` [Bug driver/42485] [4.4/4.5 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-12-30 0:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-30 00:03 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> wouldn't it be better to deprecate the -V switch altogether?
Well it works on the trunk ...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42485
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug driver/42485] [4.4/4.5 Regression] -V switch broken
2009-12-24 0:20 [Bug driver/42485] New: [4.4 regression] -V switch broken arthur dot loiret at gmail dot com
2009-12-29 23:54 ` [Bug driver/42485] " debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
2009-12-30 0:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-12-30 0:08 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-12-31 15:41 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-12-30 0:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-30 00:07 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > wouldn't it be better to deprecate the -V switch altogether?
>
> Well it works on the trunk ...
I am wrong. And it is useful thing for GCC developers really.
Confirmed.
In fact it worked with "gcc version 4.4.0 20081229 (experimental) [trunk
revision 142951] (GCC) "
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Known to fail| |4.4.0 4.5.0
Known to work| |4.3.0
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2009-12-30 00:07:53
date| |
Summary|[4.4 regression] -V switch |[4.4/4.5 Regression] -V
|broken |switch broken
Target Milestone|--- |4.4.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42485
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug driver/42485] [4.4/4.5 Regression] -V switch broken
2009-12-24 0:20 [Bug driver/42485] New: [4.4 regression] -V switch broken arthur dot loiret at gmail dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2009-12-30 0:08 ` [Bug driver/42485] [4.4/4.5 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-12-31 15:41 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-02 16:08 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-12-31 15:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-31 15:41 -------
I'm fine with deprecating -V - anyone care to send a patch?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42485
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug driver/42485] [4.4/4.5 Regression] -V switch broken
2009-12-24 0:20 [Bug driver/42485] New: [4.4 regression] -V switch broken arthur dot loiret at gmail dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2009-12-31 15:41 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-01-02 16:08 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-21 13:19 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-01-02 16:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42485
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug driver/42485] [4.4/4.5 Regression] -V switch broken
2009-12-24 0:20 [Bug driver/42485] New: [4.4 regression] -V switch broken arthur dot loiret at gmail dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2010-01-02 16:08 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-01-21 13:19 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-02-22 9:02 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-01-21 13:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.4.3 |4.4.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42485
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug driver/42485] [4.4/4.5 Regression] -V switch broken
2009-12-24 0:20 [Bug driver/42485] New: [4.4 regression] -V switch broken arthur dot loiret at gmail dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2010-01-21 13:19 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-02-22 9:02 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-02-23 10:45 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: manu at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-02-22 9:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-22 09:02 -------
Testing a patch to deprecated -b and -V.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42485
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug driver/42485] [4.4/4.5 Regression] -V switch broken
2009-12-24 0:20 [Bug driver/42485] New: [4.4 regression] -V switch broken arthur dot loiret at gmail dot com
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2010-02-22 9:02 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-02-23 10:45 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-08 17:21 ` [Bug driver/42485] [4.4/4.5/4.6 " manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-08 17:24 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: manu at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-02-23 10:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-23 10:44 -------
Patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-02/msg00915.html
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
URL| |http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
| |patches/2010-
| |02/msg00915.html
Keywords| |patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42485
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug driver/42485] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] -V switch broken
2009-12-24 0:20 [Bug driver/42485] New: [4.4 regression] -V switch broken arthur dot loiret at gmail dot com
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2010-02-23 10:45 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-04-08 17:21 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-08 17:24 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: manu at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-04-08 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 743 bytes --]
------- Comment #7 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-08 17:21 -------
Subject: Bug 42485
Author: manu
Date: Thu Apr 8 17:21:26 2010
New Revision: 158134
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=158134
Log:
2010-04-08 Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu@gcc.gnu.org>
PR 42485
* doc/invoke.texi (-b,-V): Delete.
* doc/tm.texi: Do not mention -b.
* gcc.c (display_help): Delete -b and -V.
(process_command): Delete -b and -V.
* gcc.h (DEFAULT_SWITCH_TAKES_ARG): Delete -b and -V.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
trunk/gcc/doc/tm.texi
trunk/gcc/gcc.c
trunk/gcc/gcc.h
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42485
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug driver/42485] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] -V switch broken
2009-12-24 0:20 [Bug driver/42485] New: [4.4 regression] -V switch broken arthur dot loiret at gmail dot com
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2010-04-08 17:21 ` [Bug driver/42485] [4.4/4.5/4.6 " manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-04-08 17:24 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: manu at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-04-08 17:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-08 17:24 -------
No more switch -V, so FIXED. (or WONTFIX as you prefer). Use gcc-VERSION
directly, which should work every where.
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42485
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread