* [Bug middle-end/42558] [4.5 Regression] miscompilation related to -floop-block
2009-12-30 21:07 [Bug middle-end/42558] New: [4.5 Regression] miscompilation related to -floop-block jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
@ 2009-12-30 21:08 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
2009-12-30 21:10 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk @ 2009-12-30 21:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2009-12-30 21:08 -------
Created an attachment (id=19426)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19426&action=view)
testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42558
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/42558] [4.5 Regression] miscompilation related to -floop-block
2009-12-30 21:07 [Bug middle-end/42558] New: [4.5 Regression] miscompilation related to -floop-block jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
2009-12-30 21:08 ` [Bug middle-end/42558] " jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
@ 2009-12-30 21:10 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
2009-12-30 21:34 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk @ 2009-12-30 21:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2009-12-30 21:10 -------
full version details:
> gfortran -v -floop-block -O2 -funroll-loops -ffast-math bug.f90
Driving: gfortran -v -floop-block -O2 -funroll-loops -ffast-math bug.f90
-lgfortran -lm -shared-libgcc
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gfortran
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/data03/vondele/gcc_trunk/build/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.5.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with: /data03/vondele/gcc_trunk/gcc/configure --disable-bootstrap
--prefix=/data03/vondele/gcc_trunk/build --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran
--disable-multilib --with-ppl=/data03/vondele/gcc_trunk/build/
--with-cloog=/data03/vondele/gcc_trunk/build/
--with-libelf=/data03/vondele/libelf-0.8.12/build/ --enable-gold --enable-lto
--enable-plugins
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.5.0 20091229 (experimental) [trunk revision 155502] (GCC)
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-v' '-floop-block' '-O2' '-funroll-loops' '-ffast-math'
'-shared-libgcc' '-mtune=generic'
/data03/vondele/gcc_trunk/build/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.5.0/f951
bug.f90 -quiet -dumpbase bug.f90 -mtune=generic -auxbase bug -O2 -version
-floop-block -funroll-loops -ffast-math -fintrinsic-modules-path
/data03/vondele/gcc_trunk/build/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.5.0/finclude
-o /tmp/ccVuGyWl.s
GNU Fortran (GCC) version 4.5.0 20091229 (experimental) [trunk revision 155502]
(x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
compiled by GNU C version 4.3.1 20080507 (prerelease) [gcc-4_3-branch
revision 135036], GMP version 4.2.4, MPFR version 2.4.1, MPC version 0.8
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=30 --param ggc-min-heapsize=4096
GNU Fortran (GCC) version 4.5.0 20091229 (experimental) [trunk revision 155502]
(x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
compiled by GNU C version 4.3.1 20080507 (prerelease) [gcc-4_3-branch
revision 135036], GMP version 4.2.4, MPFR version 2.4.1, MPC version 0.8
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=30 --param ggc-min-heapsize=4096
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-v' '-floop-block' '-O2' '-funroll-loops' '-ffast-math'
'-shared-libgcc' '-mtune=generic'
as -V -Qy -o /tmp/cc84OG4d.o /tmp/ccVuGyWl.s
GNU assembler version 2.18.50 (x86_64-suse-linux) using BFD version (GNU
Binutils; openSUSE 11.0) 2.18.50.20080409-11.1
COMPILER_PATH=/data03/vondele/gcc_trunk/build/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.5.0/:/data03/vondele/gcc_trunk/build/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.5.0/:/data03/vondele/gcc_trunk/build/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/:/data03/vondele/gcc_trunk/build/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.5.0/:/data03/vondele/gcc_trunk/build/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/
LIBRARY_PATH=/data03/vondele/gcc_trunk/build/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.5.0/:/data03/vondele/gcc_trunk/build/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.5.0/../../../../lib64/:/lib/../lib64/:/usr/lib/../lib64/:/data03/vondele/gcc_trunk/build/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.5.0/../../../:/lib/:/usr/lib/
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-v' '-floop-block' '-O2' '-funroll-loops' '-ffast-math'
'-shared-libgcc' '-mtune=generic'
/data03/vondele/gcc_trunk/build/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.5.0/collect2
--eh-frame-hdr -m elf_x86_64 -dynamic-linker /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
/usr/lib/../lib64/crt1.o /usr/lib/../lib64/crti.o
/data03/vondele/gcc_trunk/build/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.5.0/crtbegin.o
-L/data03/vondele/gcc_trunk/build/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.5.0
-L/data03/vondele/gcc_trunk/build/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.5.0/../../../../lib64
-L/lib/../lib64 -L/usr/lib/../lib64
-L/data03/vondele/gcc_trunk/build/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.5.0/../../..
/tmp/cc84OG4d.o -lgfortran -lm -lgcc_s -lgcc -lc -lgcc_s -lgcc
/data03/vondele/gcc_trunk/build/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.5.0/crtfastmath.o
/data03/vondele/gcc_trunk/build/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.5.0/crtend.o
/usr/lib/../lib64/crtn.o
--
jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42558
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/42558] [4.5 Regression] miscompilation related to -floop-block
2009-12-30 21:07 [Bug middle-end/42558] New: [4.5 Regression] miscompilation related to -floop-block jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
2009-12-30 21:08 ` [Bug middle-end/42558] " jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
2009-12-30 21:10 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
@ 2009-12-30 21:34 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2009-12-31 16:26 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2009-12-30 21:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-30 21:34 -------
It is caused by revision 155418:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-12/msg00562.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42558
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/42558] [4.5 Regression] miscompilation related to -floop-block
2009-12-30 21:07 [Bug middle-end/42558] New: [4.5 Regression] miscompilation related to -floop-block jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2009-12-30 21:34 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2009-12-31 16:26 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-02 16:17 ` [Bug tree-optimization/42558] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-12-31 16:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P2 |P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42558
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/42558] [4.5 Regression] miscompilation related to -floop-block
2009-12-30 21:07 [Bug middle-end/42558] New: [4.5 Regression] miscompilation related to -floop-block jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2009-12-31 16:26 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-01-02 16:17 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-02-06 16:44 ` [Bug tree-optimization/42558] [4.5 Regression][graphite] " spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-01-02 16:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|middle-end |tree-optimization
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42558
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/42558] [4.5 Regression][graphite] miscompilation related to -floop-block
2009-12-30 21:07 [Bug middle-end/42558] New: [4.5 Regression] miscompilation related to -floop-block jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2010-01-02 16:17 ` [Bug tree-optimization/42558] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-02-06 16:44 ` spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-02-06 18:08 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-02-06 19:42 ` sebpop at gmail dot com
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: spop at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-02-06 16:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-06 16:44 -------
This problem is fixed by the patch for PR42637 as installed in the Graphite
branch.
I would like to include the testcase from this PR in the Graphite testsuite.
Could somebody more fluent in Fortran rewrite the testcase under the same
format as the testcase of PR42637 with a condition like this:
if (res.ne.1.0d0) then
call abort()
end if
Thanks,
Sebastian
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 42637 ***
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42558
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/42558] [4.5 Regression][graphite] miscompilation related to -floop-block
2009-12-30 21:07 [Bug middle-end/42558] New: [4.5 Regression] miscompilation related to -floop-block jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2010-02-06 16:44 ` [Bug tree-optimization/42558] [4.5 Regression][graphite] " spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-02-06 18:08 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-02-06 19:42 ` sebpop at gmail dot com
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr @ 2010-02-06 18:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-02-06 18:08 -------
> Could somebody more fluent in Fortran rewrite the testcase under the same
> format as the testcase of PR42637 with a condition like this: ...
Is
IMPLICIT NONE
INTEGER, PARAMETER :: dp=KIND(0.0D0)
REAL(KIND=dp) :: res
res=exp_radius_very_extended( 0 , 1 , 0 , 1, &
(/0.0D0,0.0D0,0.0D0/),&
(/1.0D0,0.0D0,0.0D0/),&
(/1.0D0,0.0D0,0.0D0/),&
1.0D0,1.0D0,1.0D0,1.0D0)
if (res.ne.1.0d0) call abort()
CONTAINS
...
what you want?
Note that the test passes at revision 156540 on x86_64-apple-darwin10, so I am
not sure that it is a duplicate of 42637.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42558
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/42558] [4.5 Regression][graphite] miscompilation related to -floop-block
2009-12-30 21:07 [Bug middle-end/42558] New: [4.5 Regression] miscompilation related to -floop-block jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2010-02-06 18:08 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
@ 2010-02-06 19:42 ` sebpop at gmail dot com
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: sebpop at gmail dot com @ 2010-02-06 19:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 841 bytes --]
------- Comment #6 from sebpop at gmail dot com 2010-02-06 19:42 -------
Subject: Re: [4.5 Regression][graphite]
miscompilation related to -floop-block
> Is
>
> IMPLICIT NONE
> INTEGER, PARAMETER :: dp=KIND(0.0D0)
> REAL(KIND=dp) :: res
>
> res=exp_radius_very_extended( 0 , 1 , 0 , 1, &
> (/0.0D0,0.0D0,0.0D0/),&
> (/1.0D0,0.0D0,0.0D0/),&
> (/1.0D0,0.0D0,0.0D0/),&
> 1.0D0,1.0D0,1.0D0,1.0D0)
> if (res.ne.1.0d0) call abort()
>
> CONTAINS
> ...
>
> what you want?
Yes, thanks, I will include this in the testsuite.
Sebastian
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42558
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread