From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15366 invoked by alias); 3 Jan 2010 06:57:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 15344 invoked by uid 48); 3 Jan 2010 06:57:22 -0000 Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2010 06:57:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100103065722.15343.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/42586] New: load-modify-store on x86 should be \ single instruction In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-01/txt/msg00230.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-03 06:57 ------- (In reply to comment #7) > I reverted the summary to the original one. Well it is all interrelated :). Which is what my point was about that. Did you notice comment #3 which shows that load-modify-store actually does happen in some cases. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42586