public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/42586] New: load-modify-store on x86 should be \ single instruction Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2010 07:47:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20100103074737.19405.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-42586-7834@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> ------- Comment #15 from andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org 2010-01-03 07:47 ------- As an addendum the unnecessary stack frame seems to be a very common problem, it's in a lot of the examples near the end of http://embed.cs.utah.edu/embarrassing/dec_09/harvest/gcc-head_suncc-5.10/ typically combined with tail call optimization -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42586
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-03 7:47 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2010-01-03 6:04 [Bug rtl-optimization/42586] New: load-modify-store on x86 should be " andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org 2010-01-03 6:27 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/42586] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-03 6:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-03 6:30 ` [Bug tree-optimization/42586] SRA does not always work pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-03 6:33 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-03 6:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-03 6:39 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-03 6:55 ` [Bug tree-optimization/42586] New: load-modify-store on x86 should be \ single instruction andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org 2010-01-03 6:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-03 7:00 ` andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org 2010-01-03 7:02 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-03 7:03 ` andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org 2010-01-03 7:07 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-03 7:10 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-03 7:10 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-03 7:47 ` andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org [this message] 2010-01-03 7:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-03 8:13 ` andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org 2010-01-03 11:11 ` [Bug tree-optimization/42586] load-modify-store on x86 should be a " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-03 13:19 ` andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org 2010-01-25 17:51 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20100103074737.19405.qmail@sourceware.org \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).