From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23645 invoked by alias); 3 Jan 2010 15:11:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 23599 invoked by uid 48); 3 Jan 2010 15:10:48 -0000 Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2010 15:11:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100103151048.23598.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug libstdc++/42593] [c++0x] [4.5 Regression] std::bind not assignable to std::function In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-01/txt/msg00278.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #4 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-03 15:10 ------- Ok, Jon, thanks. At some point, however, *soon* I'm afraid given the gcc4.5 schedule, we'll have to make a tough choice: if updating only std::function leads to bad regressions in common usages of std::bind, and the latter isn't ready in time for gcc4.5 for whatever reason, we can't ship something half halfway through, I think... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42593