From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17079 invoked by alias); 3 Jan 2010 23:14:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 17034 invoked by uid 48); 3 Jan 2010 23:14:41 -0000 Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2010 23:14:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100103231441.17033.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/18219] [4.3/4.4 Regression] bloats code by 31% In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-01/txt/msg00334.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #31 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-03 23:14 ------- Heh. I wonder how we can reliably add testcases for code size issues ... can we either dump size estimates or extract object .text section sizes? Ian may know arm people who I suspect would be interested in contributing infrastructure for this. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |iant at google dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18219