* [Bug tree-optimization/18219] [4.0/4.1 Regression] gcc-4.0/4.1.0 bloats code by 31%
[not found] <bug-18219-9326@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2005-10-16 22:13 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-31 1:36 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (17 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-16 22:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Severity|normal |minor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18219
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/18219] [4.0/4.1 Regression] gcc-4.0/4.1.0 bloats code by 31%
[not found] <bug-18219-9326@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-16 22:13 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18219] [4.0/4.1 Regression] gcc-4.0/4.1.0 bloats code by 31% pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-10-31 1:36 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-09 22:43 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18219] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] gcc-4.0/4.1/4.2.0 " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (16 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-31 1:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #16 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-31 01:36 -------
Leaving as P2; this seems like something we should try to fix, if possible.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18219
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/18219] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] gcc-4.0/4.1/4.2.0 bloats code by 31%
[not found] <bug-18219-9326@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-16 22:13 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18219] [4.0/4.1 Regression] gcc-4.0/4.1.0 bloats code by 31% pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-31 1:36 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-01-09 22:43 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-09 22:44 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (15 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: steven at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-01-09 22:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #17 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-09 22:43 -------
And the numbers for "gcc (GCC) 4.1.0 20060109" are....
flags: .text size:
-Os 86 bytes
-Os -fno-ivopts 86 bytes
-m32 -Os 58 bytes
-m32 -Os -fno-ivopts 59 bytes
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18219
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/18219] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] gcc-4.0/4.1/4.2.0 bloats code by 31%
[not found] <bug-18219-9326@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2006-01-09 22:43 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18219] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] gcc-4.0/4.1/4.2.0 " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-01-09 22:44 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-09 22:50 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (14 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: steven at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-01-09 22:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #18 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-09 22:44 -------
For reference, gcc 3.3-hammer-branch has the following .text sizes:
flags: .text size:
-Os 83
-m32 -Os 44
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18219
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/18219] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] gcc-4.0/4.1/4.2.0 bloats code by 31%
[not found] <bug-18219-9326@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2006-01-09 22:44 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-01-09 22:50 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-24 0:26 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18219] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: steven at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-01-09 22:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #19 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-09 22:50 -------
Disassembly of section .text for x86 (compiled on AMD64 with -m32 -mtune=i686):
00000000 <cdt>:
0: 55 push %ebp
1: 89 e5 mov %esp,%ebp
3: 8b 4d 10 mov 0x10(%ebp),%ecx
6: 56 push %esi
7: 8b 75 14 mov 0x14(%ebp),%esi
a: 53 push %ebx
b: 8b 5d 08 mov 0x8(%ebp),%ebx
e: 8d 04 8d 00 00 00 00 lea 0x0(,%ecx,4),%eax
15: 01 c3 add %eax,%ebx
17: 03 45 0c add 0xc(%ebp),%eax
1a: 8d 50 04 lea 0x4(%eax),%edx
1d: eb 0c jmp 2b <cdt+0x2b>
1f: 8b 43 fc mov 0xfffffffc(%ebx),%eax
22: 40 inc %eax
23: 01 c0 add %eax,%eax
25: 2b 42 fc sub 0xfffffffc(%edx),%eax
28: 89 42 fc mov %eax,0xfffffffc(%edx)
2b: 41 inc %ecx
2c: 83 c3 04 add $0x4,%ebx
2f: 83 c2 04 add $0x4,%edx
32: 39 f1 cmp %esi,%ecx
34: 7e e9 jle 1f <cdt+0x1f>
36: 5b pop %ebx
37: 5e pop %esi
38: 5d pop %ebp
39: c3 ret
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18219
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/18219] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] bloats code by 31%
[not found] <bug-18219-9326@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2006-01-09 22:50 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-02-24 0:26 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-05-12 14:00 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-02-24 0:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #20 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:25 -------
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.0.3 |4.1.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18219
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/18219] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] bloats code by 31%
[not found] <bug-18219-9326@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2006-02-24 0:26 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18219] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-05-12 14:00 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-05-25 2:34 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-05-12 14:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #21 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-12 14:00 -------
This looks related to PR26726 as IVOPTs produces now
<bb 2>:
i = minLen + 1;
D.1588 = (int *) (unsigned int) (i * 4);
ivtmp.34 = limit + D.1588 - 4B;
ivtmp.40 = base + D.1588;
goto <bb 4> (<L1>);
<L0>:;
D.1595 = (int *) ivtmp.40;
MEM[base: D.1595, offset: -4B] = (MEM[base: (int *) ivtmp.34, offset: -4B] +
1 << 1) - MEM[base: D.1595, offset: -4B];
i = i + 1;
<L1>:;
ivtmp.34 = ivtmp.34 + 4B;
ivtmp.40 = ivtmp.40 + 4B;
if (i <= maxLen) goto <L0>; else goto <L2>;
with the seemingly innocuous offset: -4B canonicalization because of the weird
i386 backend cost model. Now if fixing that would fix the size issue is
another thing. Not replacing the exit test or using i as solely IV is another
thing - but it doesn't even consider i as IV candidate.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
BugsThisDependsOn| |26726
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18219
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/18219] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] bloats code by 31%
[not found] <bug-18219-9326@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2006-05-12 14:00 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-05-25 2:34 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-08-28 5:11 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-05-25 2:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #22 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-25 02:32 -------
Will not be fixed in 4.1.1; adjust target milestone to 4.1.2.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.1.1 |4.1.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18219
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/18219] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] bloats code by 31%
[not found] <bug-18219-9326@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2006-05-25 2:34 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-08-28 5:11 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-14 9:09 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18219] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-08-28 5:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #23 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-28 05:11 -------
New results from the mainline:
options size
-Os 59
-Os -fno-ivopts 52
-Os -ftree-ch 58
-O2 64
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18219
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/18219] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] bloats code by 31%
[not found] <bug-18219-9326@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2006-08-28 5:11 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-02-14 9:09 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-06-18 4:39 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-02-14 9:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.1.2 |4.1.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18219
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/18219] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] bloats code by 31%
[not found] <bug-18219-9326@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2007-02-14 9:09 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18219] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-06-18 4:39 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-06-18 10:17 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
` (7 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-06-18 4:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #24 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-18 04:39 -------
MEM[index: ivtmp.39, offset: 0x0fffffffc] = (MEM[index: ivtmp.35, offset:
0x0fffffffc] + 1 << 1) - MEM[index: ivtmp.39, offset: 0x0fffffffc];
We still get an offset of -4.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed|2004-10-29 14:30:12 |2007-06-18 04:39:14
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18219
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/18219] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] bloats code by 31%
[not found] <bug-18219-9326@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2007-06-18 4:39 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-06-18 10:17 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2007-10-29 8:29 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
` (6 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: ubizjak at gmail dot com @ 2007-06-18 10:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #25 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-06-18 10:17 -------
(In reply to comment #24)
> MEM[index: ivtmp.39, offset: 0x0fffffffc] = (MEM[index: ivtmp.35, offset:
> 0x0fffffffc] + 1 << 1) - MEM[index: ivtmp.39, offset: 0x0fffffffc];
>
>
> We still get an offset of -4.
PR target/24669
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
BugsThisDependsOn| |24669
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18219
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/18219] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] bloats code by 31%
[not found] <bug-18219-9326@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2007-06-18 10:17 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
@ 2007-10-29 8:29 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2008-07-04 16:35 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18219] [4.2/4.3/4.4 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: ubizjak at gmail dot com @ 2007-10-29 8:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #26 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-10-29 08:29 -------
We regress a bit more with
gcc version 4.3.0 20071029 (experimental) [trunk revision 129715] (GCC)
options size
-Os 60
-Os -fno-ivopts 55
-Os -ftree-ch 55
-O2 59
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18219
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/18219] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] bloats code by 31%
[not found] <bug-18219-9326@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2007-10-29 8:29 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
@ 2008-07-04 16:35 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-03-31 16:21 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18219] [4.3/4.4/4.5 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-07-04 16:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #27 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-04 16:34 -------
Closing 4.1 branch.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[4.1/4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression]|[4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression]
|bloats code by 31% |bloats code by 31%
Target Milestone|4.1.3 |4.2.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18219
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/18219] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] bloats code by 31%
[not found] <bug-18219-9326@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2008-07-04 16:35 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18219] [4.2/4.3/4.4 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-03-31 16:21 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-04 12:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-03-31 16:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #28 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-31 16:21 -------
Closing 4.2 branch.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[4.2/4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression]|[4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression]
|bloats code by 31% |bloats code by 31%
Target Milestone|4.2.5 |4.3.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18219
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/18219] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] bloats code by 31%
[not found] <bug-18219-9326@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2009-03-31 16:21 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18219] [4.3/4.4/4.5 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-08-04 12:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-03 22:57 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18219] [4.3/4.4 " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-08-04 12:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #29 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:26 -------
GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18219
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/18219] [4.3/4.4 Regression] bloats code by 31%
[not found] <bug-18219-9326@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2009-08-04 12:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-01-03 22:57 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-03 23:14 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-22 18:12 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: steven at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-01-03 22:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #30 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-03 22:57 -------
With the following compiler:
$ ./xgcc --version
xgcc (GCC) 4.5.0 20091228 (experimental) [trunk revision 155486]
Copyright (C) 2009 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
I get the following size with -m32 for the test case of comment #0:
$ ./xgcc -B. -c t.c -m32 -Os -fno-ivopts -o tOsi.o
$ ./xgcc -B. -c t.c -m32 -Os -o tOs.o
$ size tOs*
text data bss dec hex filename
45 0 0 45 2d tOsi.o
42 0 0 42 2a tOs.o
$
And I get the following size with -m64:
$ ./xgcc -B. -c t.c -Os -o tOs.o
$ ./xgcc -B. -c t.c -Os -fno-ivopts -o tOsi.o
$ size tOs*
text data bss dec hex filename
78 0 0 78 4e tOsi.o
89 0 0 89 59 tOs.o
$
This is, therefore, fixed on the trunk for GCC 4.5.
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Known to work| |4.5.0
Summary|[4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] |[4.3/4.4 Regression] bloats
|bloats code by 31% |code by 31%
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18219
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/18219] [4.3/4.4 Regression] bloats code by 31%
[not found] <bug-18219-9326@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2010-01-03 22:57 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18219] [4.3/4.4 " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-01-03 23:14 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-22 18:12 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-01-03 23:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #31 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-03 23:14 -------
Heh. I wonder how we can reliably add testcases for code size issues ...
can we either dump size estimates or extract object .text section sizes?
Ian may know arm people who I suspect would be interested in contributing
infrastructure for this.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |iant at google dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18219
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/18219] [4.3/4.4 Regression] bloats code by 31%
[not found] <bug-18219-9326@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (17 preceding siblings ...)
2010-01-03 23:14 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-05-22 18:12 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-05-22 18:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #32 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:10 -------
GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18219
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread