From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4663 invoked by alias); 7 Jan 2010 17:18:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 4628 invoked by alias); 7 Jan 2010 17:18:11 -0000 Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2010 17:18:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100107171811.4627.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c++/42649] Optimizer breaks boost shared_ptr In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "pinskia at gmail dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-01/txt/msg00813.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #7 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-01-07 17:18 ------- Subject: Re: Optimizer breaks boost shared_ptr Sent from my iPhone On Jan 7, 2010, at 8:56 AM, "rlogel at navtech dot aero" wrote: > > > ------- Comment #5 from rlogel at navtech dot aero 2010-01-07 16:56 > ------- > I realize that 3.4.6 is very old, but we need to support RedHat > Enterprise 4 > builds which use gcc 3.4.6. Then report this bug to redhat since you have a support contract with them. Also you are using a redhat modified gcc so reporting to them first is the correct thing to do. > We would rather not undertake upgrading to gcc 4.x > because we have a large legacy code base, some of which uses > writeable strings. > > > -- > > rlogel at navtech dot aero changed: > > What |Removed |Added > --- > --- > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Severity|normal |critical > Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED > Resolution|INVALID | > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42649 > -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42649